Softness in the markets prevailed for the third day, as a
bunch trade news volleys made their way back and forth and kept the major indexes
in limbo. An early drop shifted into rebound mode, an occurrence we’ve seen
regularly in the recent past, but it fell short of conquering the unchanged
lines.
Even though we closed slightly in the red, the continued resilience
of the market, to shake off bad news and remain at ridiculously elevated levels,
is remarkable. The see-saw moves over the past few days continued with utter abundance,
with the market moving headlines being clearly recognizable in this
chart.
With a record “trade deal on/trade off” reversals being the
new norm, it now included “unnamed sources” saying that “the US would be
willing to delay the December 15 tariffs, even if there is no trade deal,” but
that the pro-Hong Kong human rights bill passed by Congress could be a major
obstacle to any agreements.
Despite equity weakness, bond yields rose, which hurt
bond prices and low volatility ETFs the most. The odds
of a US-China trade deal plunged, which means, if those don’t reverse, a new
driver will be needed to keep stocks on their northerly path.
The markets started the session by meandering slightly below
their respective unchanged lines when a sudden dive took the starch out of any
existing support. As I posted yesterday, a new headline about how close the latest
trade deal might be was sure to be on deck.
Well, we got trade headlines, but they revealed exactly the
opposite of what was expected, namely that phase one of this much jawboned about
event may not be completed this year. To stoke the fire of discontent even
more, China condemned a US Senate resolution supporting human rights in Hong
Kong.
Then it was the US’s turn to emphasize that “rolling back
tariffs for a deal that fails to address core intellectual property and
technology transfer issues will not be seen as good deal for the US.” That
was the final nail in the coffin to seal the downward
trend of equities.
But the mocking continued, as the editor of China’s Global
Times, after his earlier threat that “China wants a deal but is prepared for
the worst-case scenario, a prolonged trade war,” proceeded to taunt the US farmers with “wait
for a trade deal before getting bigger tractors.” You just can’t make this
up, and it makes me wonder how long this soap opera will go on.
Despite all this negativity, a late day rebound lifted the
indexes off their lows but fell short of moving them into the green. Nevertheless,
the markets are showing tremendous resilience, especially when you consider
that the Dow has been down 2 days in a row for its biggest drop in 6 weeks, and
this very drop amounted to less than 1%.
The S&P 500 has not had 1% correction in 28 days and,
as ZH points out, it went 36 days in June/July without one. Of course, as I have
pointed out on many occasion, the main driver that controls market direction is
global liquidity, which this
chart (Source: Bloomberg) clearly demonstrates.
Today we experienced a market condition, which we have
not seen in a while, namely not just an intra-day sell off, but also a red
close of more than the occasional shocking -0.01%, at least for the Dow. Of
course, I am being facetious here, but the usual end of the day ramp saved the
S&P 500 and Nasdaq.
However, given the relentless march higher, today’s partial
retreat was more than overdue. A slightly positive opening gave way to a gentle
slide into the red zone, but the bullish theme remained strong enough to assist
in the recovery.
Not helping matters were disappointing earnings results
and the good old standby excuse that a US-China deal has become questionable.
Home Depot’s shares took
a hit with the company not just posting a miss in Q3 sales,
but more importantly, they slashed their full-year sales guidance as well. Ouch!
However, offsetting that poor report was a rise in US home building and permits
for future construction.
Clearly, the economy, despite being hyped up, is mixed
bag at best. Even the Fed’s John Williams seems to agree as he posted things
like “the economy is clearly facing several challenges, primarily from
overseas, but the three rate cuts since July should help sustain growth,” on
which he elaborated further with the US “facing headwinds from slower global
growth.”
In the end, nothing much was gained or lost, except the
Nasdaq remained on the plus side all day and added +0.24%. At least the tech arena
showed signs of life in the face of a sinking retail
sector, where the stocks of Home Depot and Kohls were sent reeling.
With no obvious driver to help the markets today, I imagine
that we will see a new rollout of “the trade deal is close” headlines
latest by tomorrow, in order to pump stocks further into record territory.
When the Fed announced a few weeks ago that it would be
buying up Treasury debt to the tune of $60 billion a month, it sure sounded to
everyone on Wall Street that another round of QE (Quantitative Easing) had
started. However, Fed chief Powell insisted that this is “in no sense is QE.”
Yeah right.
Author Charles
Hugh Smith wasn’t in agreement either and quoted in a recent post a
riddle that Abraham Lincoln was known to have told: “If I should call a
sheep’s tail a leg, how many legs would it have? — Five! — “No, only four; for
my calling the tail a leg would not make it so.”
That is a great analogy to the Fed’s QE implantation
which, despite all denials, is a bailout of some sort, most likely of the repo
market, about which I have commented on from time to time. And, as this
chart depicts, it may have been a panic reaction, and I am certain
that this will not be the last we’ve heard about repo issues.
While the major indexes see-sawed throughout the day, the
bullish bias remained intact with the Dow and Nasdaq eking out tiny gains, but the
S&P slipped a fraction. These small moves were actual significant in that the
usual driver, namely US-China trade news, was neutralized.
There were announcements about “progress” and “setbacks,”
cancelling each other out, which is what market direction reflected. Over the weekend,
we learned that top negotiators held “constructive” discussions, but other
reports suggested that without rolling back existing tariffs, the outlook for a
resolution looked questionable.
With trade news playing an immaterial role in the market today,
traders focused on a meeting between Trump
and Powell, with speculation running wild as to what these two discussed. Trump
released this statement:
Just finished a very good & cordial
meeting at the White House with Jay Powell of the Federal Reserve. Everything
was discussed including interest rates, negative interest, low inflation,
easing, Dollar strength & its effect on manufacturing, trade with China,
E.U. & others, etc.
I am sure that by tomorrow morning, the computer algos
may have found some more bullish meat on that bone, probably just enough to keep
the ramp going. If that doesn’t work, there is always another short
squeeze to be done, just like we saw today, which gave a big assist in pulling
the indexes off their lows. (Source: Bloomberg)
Below, please find the latest High-Volume ETF Cutline
report, which shows how far above or below their respective long-term trend
lines (39-week SMA) my currently tracked ETFs are positioned.
This report covers the HV ETF Master List from Thursday’s
StatSheet and includes 322 High Volume ETFs, defined as those with an average
daily volume of more than $5 million, of which currently 281 (last week 282)
are hovering in bullish territory. The yellow line separates those ETFs that
are positioned above their trend line (%M/A) from those that have dropped below
it.
In case you are not familiar
with some of the terminology used in the reports, please read the Glossary of Terms.
If you missed the original
post about the Cutline approach, you can read it here.
DRIVING
THE MARKETS: TRADE HOPE AND RETAIL HEADLINE
[Chart courtesy of MarketWatch.com]
Moving the markets
While
today’s headline retail number showed a rise of +0.3% MoM, which was better than
the expected +0.2%, the under the hood core number looked mixed at best by only
rising +0.1% MoM vs. an expected +0.3%. But headline news are what computer algos
read, so up we went.
The
initial boost came from alleged positive US-China trade war developments,
with the White House econ advisor Kudlow saying Thursday night that “negotiators
are getting close to an agreement,” however, Trump added that “he likes
what he sees, he’s not ready to make a commitment, we have no agreement just
yet.”
In
other words, there is no deal, only promises and possibilities, but that’s all
it takes these days to keep traders and algos happy, a condition which pushed the
major indexes into new all-time territory.
Even
poor economic news good not stem the march higher. US MoM Industrial Production
plunged
the most since March 2009, as October’s -0.8% collapse led to a YoY
decline of -1.13%. In addition, Manufacturing
output fell -0.6%, its weakest reading since December 2015 (Source: ZeroHedge).
I
am merely pointing this out to clarify that the stock market and the underlying
economy are in no way connected, and that a high level of stock prices does not
indicate a solid economic environment.
This
is further confirmed by the fact that the GDP for Q4 2019 has crashed with the US
economy growing at its slowest pace in 4 years, as the Fed’s tracking estimates
having tumbled by over 0.4% just the past week. The US GDP in Q4 2019 is now set
to print at around 0.35%, which is anemic and in no way justifies the current
level of stock indexes.
But
that is not what matters. What is critically important for the continuation of
the bullish ramp, as I pointed out before, is the liquidity in the market, which
has been created by an increase in the Fed’s balance
sheet. It grew by some $280 billion in the past two months alone and is directly
responsible for driving equities relentlessly higher.