Never Too Big To Admit Mistakes

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

I have repeatedly talked about the importance of not only tracking a sell stop but actually executing it when the price point is triggered. Many readers have told me that this is one of the most difficult things to do. Why? Very simply, because it is an admission of having been wrong especially if that sell stop triggers a loss as opposed to locking in a gain.

Get over it! When you invest, you will have losses and admitting that you were wrong from time to time will not kill your portfolio. What will kill it is letting small losses turn into large ones.

If you need a reason to get over that false sense of pride, take a look at how Warren Buffett, one of the greatest investors of our times, handles this issue. If you think he never makes mistakes, think again. Here’s an excerpt of his letter to shareholders (page 8) for the world to see:

And now it’s confession time. It should be noted that no consultant, board of directors or investment banker pushed me into the mistakes I will describe. In tennis parlance, they were all unforced errors.

To begin with, I almost blew the See’s purchase. The seller was asking $30 million, and I was adamant about not going above $25 million. Fortunately, he caved. Otherwise I would have balked, and that $1.35 billion would have gone to somebody else.

About the time of the See’s purchase, Tom Murphy, then running Capital Cities Broadcasting, called and offered me the Dallas-Fort Worth NBC station for $35 million. The station came with the Fort Worth paper that Capital Cities was buying, and under the “cross-ownership” rules Murph had to divest it. I knew that TV stations were See’s-like businesses that required virtually no capital investment and had excellent prospects for growth. They were simple to run and showered cash on their owners.

Moreover, Murph, then as now, was a close friend, a man I admired as an extraordinary manager and outstanding human being. He knew the television business forward and backward and would not have called me unless he felt a purchase was certain to work. In effect Murph whispered “buy” into my ear. But I didn’t listen.

In 2006, the station earned $73 million pre-tax, bringing its total earnings since I turned down the deal to at least $1 billion – almost all available to its owner for other purposes. Moreover, the property now has a capital value of about $800 million. Why did I say “no”? The only explanation is that my brain had gone on vacation and forgot to notify me. (My behavior resembled that of a politician Molly Ivins once described: “If his I.Q. was any lower, you would have to water him twice a day.”)

Finally, I made an even worse mistake when I said “yes” to Dexter, a shoe business I bought in 1993 for $433 million in Berkshire stock (25,203 shares of A). What I had assessed as durable competitive advantage vanished within a few years. But that’s just the beginning: By using Berkshire stock, I compounded this error hugely. That move made the cost to Berkshire shareholders not $400 million, but rather $3.5 billion. In essence, I gave away 1.6% of a wonderful business – one now valued at $220 billion – to buy a worthless business.

To date, Dexter is the worst deal that I’ve made. But I’ll make more mistakes in the future – you can bet on that. A line from Bobby Bare’s country song explains what too often happens with acquisitions:

“I’ve never gone to bed with an ugly woman, but I’ve sure woke up with a few.”

I like his down to earth style of describing how things are and not how he would like them to be. There are great lessons to be learned from his attitude, so take that to heart and next time you find yourself on the losing end of a transaction, swallow your pride and think how Warren Buffett handles failures.

If you openly admit to a loss, rather than trying to hide it, you might even get some (deserved) sympathy from your better half.

No Load Fund/ETF Tracker updated through 4/24/2008

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

My latest No Load Fund/ETF Tracker has been posted at:

http://www.successful-investment.com/newsletter-archive.php

Bulls and bears engaged in a tug-of-war with the bulls coming out ahead for the week by a slight margin.

Our Trend Tracking Index (TTI) for domestic funds/ETFs has moved now +1.33% above its long-term trend line (red), which means we remain close to breaking out to the upside of the neutral zone.



The international index dropped to -2.58% below its own trend line, keeping us in a sell mode.



For more details, and the latest market commentary, as well as the updated No load Fund/ETF StatSheet, please see the above link.

Going Nowhere

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

The markets zigzagged yesterday, but ended up closing modestly higher thanks to support from industry heavyweights Boeing and Microsoft. Despite this higher close, participation was not widespread, which explains why our Trend Tracking Indexes (TTIs) retreated slightly.

The domestic TTI fell to a level of +1.37% above its long-term trend line, just below the upper range (+1.50%) of the neutral zone. We will hold off with any further commitments to the domestic market until a sustainable breakout occurs.

The International TTI slipped as well and is now positioned -3.82% below its own long-term trend line, which has kept us out of this market since 11/31/07.

Off The High

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

The markets retreated yesterday as the dollar’s record new low against the Euro, along with soft earnings and oil prices hugging the $120/barrel mark, proved too much resistance. The bears prevailed and sent the major indexes lower, although a rebound late in the session cut down on the losses.

Our domestic Trend Tracking Index (TTI) came off its high, and dropped below the +1.50% threshold to +1.48%. This means we’re back in the neutral zone and will have to wait for another breakout with legs before making any commitments to that market.

The International TTI retreated as well and is currently positioned -3.32% below its own long-term trend line. The bottom line is that there have been no changes to our investment positions.

If the domestic TTI continues to vacillate around its buy level, I will post updates as necessary in this blog so that you can easily follow the changes in our investment strategy as they occur.

Are We There Yet?

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

Yesterday’s fairly calm day in the market pushed our domestic Trend Tracking Index (TTI) through the upper range of the neutral zone (+1.50%) to a level of +1.73% above its long-term trend line.

As I mentioned in last Thursday’s post, I like to see that level supported for a few trading days to be sure that there is enough follow through buying to support this current trend. If this comes to pass, I will announce a new Buy signal on this blog the day it occurs. I will then ease into the domestic markets with about 1/3 of portfolio value, not all at once, but over a week or so. My no load fund/ETF selections will be based on those showing the strongest upward momentum numbers.

The international Trend Tracking Index (TTI) has improved but still remains -3.01% below its own long-term trend line in bear market territory.

As I am posting this on Tuesday morning, the markets are down sharply and, barring any sudden recovery, we may end up again back in the neutral zone below the +1.50% level. This potential buy may or may not materialize. I will keep you posted.

Another Bailout

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

Market Watch reports that the Bank of England is to unveil a mortgage bailout:

Faced with rising mortgage rates that threaten to worsen a housing downturn, the Bank of England will unveil a plan Monday to allow banks to swap billions of pounds worth of mortgage-backed securities for British government bonds in a bid to thaw frozen credit markets, Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling said Sunday.

“The Bank of England will be making an announcement” on Monday, Darling said in a BBC television interview. “What it will do is effectively lend banks money to unfreeze the situation we have got at the moment.”

Shares of Britain’s biggest lenders rose late last week in anticipation of the plan. Darling also said he expects more banks to unveil details of subprime-related losses, the size of their mortgage-backed securities holdings and plans to raise capital.

U.K. mortgage rates have risen and lenders have increasingly tightened lending conditions and have pulled some mortgage products off the market as banks have become increasingly reluctant to lend money to each other.

Banks have hoarded cash as they’ve sought to rebuild their own balance sheets in the wake of the subprime mortgage meltdown, analysts say. Also, uncertainty over the condition of rival banks saddled with mortgage-related securities has made banks reluctant to make loans to each other.

The plan to be unveiled by the central bank is expected to see the Bank of England offer to swap as much as 50 billion pounds worth of government bonds, or gilts, for certain types of mortgage-backed securities for a period of up to a year or more, according to analysts and news reports. Banks would then be able to use the government bonds as collateral for loans from other banks.

Darling said the plan would help open up the U.K. mortgage market.

“We are doing our bit and I would like to see the banks pass on the benefit of the three interest rate cuts” by the Bank of England since December, Darling said.

Rising mortgage rates threaten to exacerbate a downturn in the British housing market, which could also accelerate a slump in consumer spending and worsen an expected economic slowdown, economists say.

Darling denied that the plan, which bears similarities to the expanded lending facility announced by the U.S. Federal Reserve last month, is a bailout. Banks will borrow the gilts, pledging the mortgage-backed securities as collateral.

[Emphasis added]

If it walks like a duck and squawks like a duck, it most likely is a duck. Just as the Fed’s willingness to accept sub par securities in exchange for U.S. Treasuries, the Bank of England has chosen to go the same route.

The plan is expected to see banks forced to take a “haircut” on the value of the mortgage-backed securities in a bid to protect taxpayers should a bank be unable to repay and the Bank of England is stuck with the mortgage-backed security. Strictly as an example, banks could be allowed to post 100 pounds worth of securities in return for 80 pounds worth of bonds, economists said.

OK, so they try to build in a safety cushion, although that is not a sure thing yet. So far no one has been able to accurately determine fair market value for any of these pledged securities here in the U.S. or in England. At least, there is no public knowledge of it.

Here’s the rub. If the values are less at sometime in the future, the loss will be socialized, if there is a gain, it will be privatized by the Bank of England. That smells like a sugar coated bailout to me.