Well, it sure didn’t take
much effort to keep the markets going, as Trump successfully dangled the trade
carrot again via this tweet:
“Big day of negotiations
with China. They want to make a deal, but do I? I meet with the Vice Premier
tomorrow at The White House.”
While this did not indicate
really anything, the computer algos saw it as a positive, since China’s chief
trade negotiator Vice Premier Liu He is staying in town till Friday, at least
for now. That was all it took to ramp the markets higher in a vain attempt to get
back to even for the week.
However, a US-China deal is
based on nothing but hope, because as ZH noted correctly:
“The US has not changed
its extensive and rigorous requests for China, nor has it responded to China’s
core concerns,” Renmin University international relations professor Shi
Yinhong said.
“Even if there is a deal, it
could only be a mini-deal, even a minimal mini-deal. A currency pact, if true,
does not bring any substance.”
But optimism is all that
matters, so we’ll have to wait and see how this movie plays out. Given recent history,
this could very well turn into another head fake.
In the meantime, the major
indexes managed to whipsaw around above their respective unchanged lines and scored
another winning session for the second day in row, which was in part supported
by a short
squeeze in SmallCaps.
Still, the S&P 500 needs
to gain about 1.3% from today’s level in order to reach last Friday’s close.
It seems like yesterday’s trade
jawboning between the US and China had taken on too harsh of a tone, so both parties
attempted to ease festering tensions. News reports indicated that China was open
to a “limited or partial tariff solution” while offering to increase purchases of
agricultural products from US farmers to $50 billion.
That was enough of a driver
to push the indexes higher, despite weak domestic data showing Job Openings
plunging to a 17-month low and confirming that Hiring/Quitting continues to remain
on a slippery slope.
Then the Minutes from the last
FOMC meeting on interest rates showed that officials have become somewhat concerned
about the state of the economy with some members arguing that the chances of a
U.S. recession “had increased notably in recent months.”
While that is a negative, it
is not one in today’s environment, where stock market levels are largely supported
by ever decreasing interest rates. And, a recessionary environment pretty much guarantees
that rates will head lower, which is exactly what the markets anticipate when the
Fed meets later this month.
While today’s rebound
encouraged the bullish crowd, it’s noteworthy that this activity was
accompanied by very low volume, about 30% below average, which means the rally
was lacking conviction and may not have enough legs to continue.
Be that as it may, our Trend
Tracking Index (TTI), after slipping below its long-term trend line yesterday, mustered
enough strength to climb back above it by +0.49% indicating, at least for the
time being, that the bullish trend is still alive.
After the Chinese offered
not much hope for a successful outcome of the upcoming trade meeting, today it
was the US’s turn to up the ante by blacklisting 28 Chinese companies due to
alleged human-rights violations against Muslim minorities.
Should this mutual hostility
fest continue, Friday’s scheduled high-level trade meeting might be over before
it even starts. So, it came as no surprise that the markets sold off sharply,
as “trade hope” has been one of the constant drivers of equities.
Then Fed head Powell
attempted, with modest success, to levitate equities by announcing something that
sounded like QE (Quantitative Easing) but wasn’t given that name. Here’s part of
what he said:
While a range of factors may
have contributed to these developments, it is clear that without a sufficient
quantity of reserves in the banking system, even routine increases in funding
pressures can lead to outsized movements in money market interest rates. This
volatility can impede the effective implementation of monetary policy, and we
are addressing it.
Indeed, my colleagues and I
will soon announce measures to add to the supply of reserves over time.
Consistent with a decision
we made in January, our goal is to provide an ample supply of reserves to
ensure that control of the federal funds rate and other short-term interest
rates is exercised primarily by setting our administered rates and not through
frequent market interventions. Of course, we will not hesitate to conduct
temporary operations if needed to foster trading in the federal funds market at
rates within the target range.
“I want to
emphasize that growth of our balance sheet for reserve management purposes
should in no way be confused with the large-scale asset purchase programs that
we deployed after the financial crisis.”
ZH supplied the rough translation
of the above:
Don’t confuse balance sheet growth for “reserve management” with balance sheet growth for “stock market management.”
While that helped equities to regain some footing, it was short-lived, as Trump stepped up by announcing notable actions against human rights abusers in China, which just about destroyed any gains from Powell’s talk and furthermore may have put a big temporary nail in the trade coffin.
Stocks had enough of this
and south we went in a hurry with the major indexes closing not only at new
lows for the day but also hitting critical technical levels.
For the last 1.5 years, ZH
has been tracking current market direction compared to events leading up to the
crash of 1987, as this
chart shows.
While history may not repeat,
the above chart makes a solid case, that it may. Additionally, our main directional
indicator, the Domestic Trend Tracking Index (TTI), pierced its long-term trend
line to the downside today by -0.39% for the first time since February.
While this is only a scant piercing,
it nevertheless indicates that tough times for stocks could be ahead. I will watch
developments closely, and if more weakness persists tomorrow, will start liquidating
some of our more volatile holdings with the remainder being on the chopping block
soon thereafter.
I would not be the least bit
surprised, given current and recent chaotic events, if we find ourselves back on
the safety of the sidelines very soon and watching the markets self-destruct.
An early drop was followed
by a pop above the unchanged line but in the end, equities simply ran out of steam
with the S&P closing at its lows for the session.
Early words of hope regarding
the always uncertain US-Trade relations managed to pull the markets higher, but
even the often confused computer algos must have interpreted that as nothing but
hot air, and down we went.
Of course, uncertainty reigned
supreme with high-level tariff negotiations between Washington and Beijing being
on deck for later this week. Setting the tone were Chinese officials, as they expressed
reluctance to hammer out a broad agreement in Washington this Thursday and Friday.
The market
odds seem to support that view.
I have commented on the rather
complex inner workings of the overnight repo market, as well the fact that some
of the financial plumbing appears either not to be not working or has simply
broken down. ZH presented this chart
showing that, despite the last quarter being over, the problems continued, as
repo demand has picked up again.
As I posted before, a short-term
disconnect is nothing to worry about, but we’re now past the point of a temporary
assist by the Fed, and I will watch closely if this will turn into a precursor for
more weakness in equities.
On a personal note, I will not be posting today and Friday. This time it’s not a business issue, but a personal one. My wife and I will be traveling to San Diego to be part of my son’s wedding. I will, however, monitor the markets and adjust our holdings, should that become necessary. Regular posting will resume this coming Monday.
I mentioned yesterday that our International Trend Tracking Index (TTI) had crossed its long-term trend line to the downside by -2.00%.
This morning, it took another steep dive thereby clearly heading deeper into bear market territory, which means a ‘Sell’ signal, effective today, has been generated.
As I posted at the time of the ‘Buy’, I did not participate in this cycle due to us being 100% invested in the domestic arena.
If you are following my methodology, this means that all “broadly diversified international funds/ETFs” should no longer be held.