Two Types Of Whip-Saw Signals

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

Reader VR posted these comments:

I understand there are two ways you can get whip-sawed. One is the big bang event in which the trend line crosses from buy-to-sell-to-buy.

The other and more frequent one within the buy cycle is if your fund drops more than a certain percentage points stopping you out and then going back up through the old high prompting you to get back into the market.

Can you give us an insight into any analysis you may have done to tell us whether it is beneficial to follow only the larger cycles or to follow the more frequent cycles within the ‘buy’ zone?

In other words, is it better to just follow the trend line?

The short and incomplete answer would be: It depends on market behavior.

If you have a slow and steady uptrend, with the Trend Tracking Indexes (TTIs) remaining fairly close to their trend lines, then you could use the trend line as your exit point. Actually, that’s what I have done throughout the late 80, 90s and into the year 2000.

Things changed when the tech bubble burst and the markets not only crashed but also whip-sawed several times during the first nine months of 2000. Take a look at a chart of the domestic TTI for that period:



The large red arrows on the left show the highs and lows the domestic TTI made during the blow-off period. It is obvious that, if you had followed the piercing of the trend line as a signal to sell, you would have given back most of your accumulated profits since the Buy of 11/17/1999.

That is the inherent problem. Whether you use the TTIs as I do, or simple 200-day moving averages for individual funds/ETFs, the issue remains the same.

A strong bullish period will drive the price line (green) way above trend line (red). If this happens within a short period of time (6 months or less), the trend line lags too much to lock in any profits in the event of a trend reversal. While you may avoid an above the trend line whip-saw here and there, you also risk giving back most of your gains.

That creates an emotional problem for investors as well when seeing accumulated profits evaporate by waiting for the trend line piercing to generate the sell. I have seen, during violent moves such as the above chart shows, unrealized gains of 40% evaporate down to 3%. While you personally maybe be able to handle that, if you manage money for others, that is simply not acceptable.

The bottom line is that I have found the use of a trailing sell stop, when above the trend line, a far better choice in controlling risk (locking in profits and limiting losses), especially in the volatile environment we are living in.

No Load Fund/ETF Tracker updated through 11/12/2009

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

My latest No Load Fund/ETF Tracker has been posted at:

http://www.successful-investment.com/newsletter-archive.php

Continued bullishness has the S&P; 500 knocking on its 1,100 level.

Our Trend Tracking Index (TTI) for domestic funds/ETFs has now crossed its trend line (red) to the upside by +8.45% keeping the current buy signal intact. The effective date was June 3, 2009.



The international index has now broken above its long-term trend line by +13.21%. A Buy signal was triggered effective May 11, 2009. We are holding our positions subject to a trailing stop loss.



[Click on charts to enlarge]

For more details, and the latest market commentary, as well as the updated No load Fund/ETF StatSheet, please see the above link.

Deploying “Stopped Out” Money

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

The use of sell stops and re-investing monies you have been stopped out of as the market resumes its upward trend, has been the hot topic of the past few weeks. Reader Paul had this to add:

A few questions regarding your tactics for reentering the market with “stopped out” money:

1. Typically, what kicks off your decision to start reentering the market?
2. Do you only enter into funds that have a 0.0 %DD?
3. Assuming the trend remains positive, do you give yourself a target deadline for reinvesting all of your “stopped out” money?

For one, a resumption of upward momentum will always make me realize that I have been whip-sawed and cause me to re-deploy the proceeds such as happened early this week.

Second, depending on your risk aversion, you could wait until the funds/ETFs, you’ve been stopped out of, take out their old highs before re-entering. Or, you could select different funds/ETFs along the lines as I profiled back in July in “Using The Benefit Of Hindsight.”

Third, I don’t give myself a deadline for re-investing stopped out money but, if I see a rally building early in the morning, such as we had last Monday, I try to get back in as quickly as I can.

Keep in mind that trying to find a new entry point is not an exact science. You never know for sure if you’re making the right move at the right time. The idea is to get back onboard quickly if the trend goes your way. This also means that you need to quickly accept the fact that the stop point may have turned into a whip-saw by not dwelling on it.

That’s the moment in time to look at the big picture and remember that you are using stop losses for a reason, which is to limit downside risk.

An Emerging-Markets Bubble?

Ulli Uncategorized Contact



The WSJ featured an interesting viewpoint in “Are ETFs Causing an Emerging-Markets Bubble?” Here are a few highlights:

U.S. investors have pumped roughly $26 billion into emerging-markets funds so far this year. Of that, $15 billion came in through exchange-traded funds — portfolios that hold every stock in a market benchmark with utterly no regard to price.

Several hedge-fund managers and other active stockpickers have told me that this “mindless money” is distorting valuations and pumping up a potentially monstrous bubble.

At first blush, it is hard to imagine that they are wrong. As money pours into the ETFs, they must mechanically match their holdings to those in the emerging-market indexes. That forced buying drives up stock prices, attracting still more new money into the ETFs, spiraling stock prices even higher.

Even Gus Sauter, chief investment officer at Vanguard Group, one of the world’s largest managers of index funds and ETFs, is concerned. “Obviously it’s the last trade that determines the price of everything,” he says, “and there have been large flows [from ETFs into emerging markets], perhaps leading to a bit of a bubble.”

Mr. Sauter adds that several markets, such as Brazil and Peru, are up roughly 100% in 2009. “Either something has changed quite dramatically,” he deadpans, “or pricing has been dislocated from reality. And it’s probably a little bit of the latter.”
…

Thanks to obscure provisions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code and the Investment Company Act of 1940, which governs how mutual funds are organized, ETFs can’t allow their assets to become over-concentrated in a handful of holdings. In general, they can’t keep more than 25% of their money in a single stock, and at least half of their assets must be in securities that each account for no more than 5% of total holdings.

Now that emerging markets have risen so far so fast, these tax requirements may compel some large ETFs to begin selling their biggest holdings. Ms. Ting says that her fund automatically sells some of its Petrobras holdings, currently 23% of assets, whenever they near the 25% threshold. They are replaced, she says, with “securities with similar risk factors.”
…

So what does all this mean for investors? ETFs probably haven’t caused a bubble, and they might even help a bit to prevent one from forming. But many will remain superconcentrated bets on very risky markets. If you invest in an ETF with most of its assets in a few stocks and think you have made a diversified bet, the real bubble is the one between your own ears.

As a general rule, I don’t think bubbles in any market pop over night. Sure, you may have the occasional Black Swan event, but even during last year’s market crash, prices started to head lower at a slow pace at first and accelerated later on.

Take a look at the EEM chart above. For those with sell stops in place, the initial market pullback provided plenty of opportunity to liquidate any positions. Even if you gave yourself more room and sold as the price crossed the trend line to the downside, you would have had no problem getting out.

As always, the key here is not to worry about wild speculations as to what might or might not happen to this market but to be prepared to exit when the trends reverse.

That alertness to changing conditions, more than anything else, will save your portfolio from a receiving a severe haircut and will help you emotionally to better deal with a declining market.

Disclosure: We currently have no positions in EEM.

A Lot Of Green

Ulli Uncategorized Contact



From the moment the markets opened yesterday, it was up, up and away with the Dow hitting a new high for 2009.

Friday’s unemployment figure of 10.2% contributed in a perverse way to yesterday’s rally supporting the view that with such dire news, interest rates will have to stay low for some time to come, which bodes well for stocks.

Additional market support came from the G-20 via an agreement over the past weekend to keep the stimulus programs going. That’s all that was needed, and the major averages never looked back.

I took the opportunity early on yesterday morning to add some new positions, in essence replacing those that we were stopped out of during the last pullback. Of course, all sell stop points have been identified and will be executed when necessary.

While the stamina the market has shown is simply amazing, I have to wonder how long it can last. Since no one has the answer, we will simply follow the trend until the end when it bends.

Price Discrepancies

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

While ETFS have many advantages over mutual funds, they have not been around long enough to address all issues that might affect their NAVs as Seeking Alpha reports in “Bond ETFs Suffer from Pricing Discrepancies:”

Exchange traded funds (ETFs) have many of the built-in advantages that mutual funds have, but there are also differences. In my view, the biggest difference is not the fact that ETFs trade throughout the day or even how ETF pricing works, but rather that ETFs have a very short operating history.

We use both mutual funds and ETFs so I am not at all negative about exchange traded funds, but I am aware that there will be growing pains as the ETF industry matures.

In this piece from the Wall Street Journal [registration may be required], we see problems arising in bond ETFs. Namely, that it is hard to price some of the underlying bonds in the various ETF portfolios accurately. Or, it may be difficult for a given ETF to replicate a bond index exactly because the index may hold some bonds that are not traded frequently.
…

…Share prices of many bond ETFs are drifting far from the value of their underlying holdings, which can create big trading costs for investors. Some of the funds are straying from their benchmarks, meaning investors aren’t getting the returns they expected.

…ETFs, typically cheap, straightforward products designed to act like index funds, generally track the performance of a benchmark for stocks, bonds or commodities. But they differ from traditional mutual funds because they trade throughout the day on an exchange.

Keeping ETF returns in line with the indexes has proven to be tough in the murky bond market…

…State Street Corp.’s SPDR Barclays Capital High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) fell nearly 1% in the 12 months ending Aug. 31, even while its benchmark gained 6%…

…The iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG), for example, traded at a 7% premium at one point in April, and traded within 0.5% of its NAV on only five days in the third quarter…

Such wide gaps aren’t generally supposed to appear in ETFs. Big investors can typically buy up the fund’s underlying holdings and swap them for ETF shares, arbitraging away any significant gaps between the ETF share price and NAV.

But bonds can be so tough to trade that large investors become reluctant to perform this function for fixed-income ETFs. Even when they do make the trades, they incur big trading costs that get factored into the price of the ETF shares…
…

Bond ETFs set the NAV based on estimates of the prices they would get if they sold their holdings. Meanwhile, most bond ETFs are bringing in new money now, so the dealers responsible for creating ETF shares need to constantly buy new securities. That takes place at the higher “offer” side. To compensate, dealers will price the ETF shares higher than NAV, resulting in the bias toward a premium.

If it’s a matter of buying and selling at inflated prices, it’s a wash. But sometimes, investors who bought at a premium end up selling at a discount. “If everybody is selling, it’s also a time where there may not be much liquidity in the bond market, and…funds will be trading at NAV or at a discount to NAV,” says Kenneth Volpert, a principal at Vanguard Group.

In fact, when investors fled corporate bonds last fall, many bond ETFs traded at meaningful discounts. This year, some $25 billion has gone into bond ETFs, a good portion of which is chasing big returns in high-yield bonds, which are notoriously difficult to trade in tough times. How would ETF prices handle that money being pulled out in a flash?…

So far, the discrepancies between a given ETF’s share price and its net asset value (NAV) seem to be manageable. As anyone who has ever purchased bonds knows, bond traders do a good job of exacting their pound of flesh, particularly for thinly-traded securities. So, the cost of putting together a portfolio that matches a given index would be very difficult and costly.

This last point is a good one though. If all the investors in a given ETF want to get out at the same time, raising cash may be an issue. And, if a given ETF has to raise a lot of cash quickly, it will probably get dinged a bit on those securities that it sells.

[Emphasis added]

While there is no good way to deal with this pricing issue, you might want to consider no load mutual funds if your mode of operation is to generate income.

However, in a zero interest rate environment, the risk in bonds, bond ETFs and bond mutual funds is clearly to the downside, especially if inflation rears its ugly head somewhere down the line.

While there is no perfect solution to deal with this issue, I would never hold any of these funds/ETFs without the use of a trailing sell stop.

When the tide turns and interest rates rise, you want to be one of the first heading for the exit doors before they become too crowded. A trailing sell stop may just be the vehicle to get you there before the masses wake up and follow suit.