More On The State Of The Economy

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

When commenting on economic issues in my weekly updates and/or daily blog posts, it seems that lately the most frequently used word has been “unexpected;” as in economists had expected a different outcome in regards to economic reports as was reported by the government.

At times, the difference between expectations and actual outcome has been quite stunning confirming my long held belief that forecasting is more or less a hit or miss proposition.

With few exceptions, most economists operate based on the herd mentality meaning that you can be wrong in your call as long as everyone else is wrong too. If you buck the trend with your forecast, you better be right or you may have to look for a new career.

My preference is to listen to successful business people to see what they have to say on the state of the economy and how it affects their company and future plans. While that does not mean they’re always right, it represents more of a reality as opposed to just economic academia.

Hat tip goes to reader Frank for sending in this video featuring an interview with billionaire Steve Wynn. You may not agree with all he has to say, but he shares some interesting viewpoints.


Sunday Musings: More Bond Bubble Thoughts

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

In regards to last Sunday’s post Bond Bubble Thoughts, reader Mal emailed this article titled “The Treasury Bond Bubble: A Survival Guide for Investors:

Concerns have been escalating lately about the possible risks of investing in Treasury bonds. Just how bad is that risk, and what should investors do about it?

The most ominous warning came from Tobias M. Levkovich, U.S. equity strategist at Citigroup. In a note to clients on Monday, Levovich said he had found a “startling” correlation between equity returns in the period from 1990 to 2005 and Treasury bonds since 2000.

“It would suggest that the tremendous money flows into bond funds could end with similar losses to that which transpired for equity investors who poured cash excessively into stock funds back in 2000,” Levkovich wrote. He was referring, of course, to the dot-com crash, when the Nasdaq index declined 46% from September 2000 to January 2001.

Rates Can Only Go Up From Here

Writing in The Wall Street Journal on Tuesday, Jeremy Siegel, a finance professor at the University of Pennsylvania, and Jeremy Schwartz, director of research at WisdomTree, a sponsor of exchange-traded funds, warned that investors in bond funds are “courting disaster,” and made the same comparison to the 2000 tech-stock bubble.

Siegel and Schwartz said that if 10-year Treasury bond rates, now at 2.8%, rise to 4%, the capital loss on bonds will be more than three times the current yield. They said there was no doubt that interest rates would rise as government programs to care for the baby boomer generation kick into gear.

So what’s an investor with a bond portfolio heavily invested in Treasuries, which have the cachet of being the world’s safest investment, supposed to do now? Some investment advisers recommend coming up with a long-term plan and sticking to it despite the marketplace’s short-term ups and downs.

Consider Good-Quality Corporate Bonds

But even with a long-term strategy in place, investors can tweak their portfolio to avoid a potential disaster.

Marilyn Cohen is a fund manager at Envision Capital Management, a Los Angles fixed-income investment management company, and the author of Bonds Now!, a bestselling guide to bond investing. She urges investors with large investments in Treasury bond funds to “take some or all of your gains off the table.”

Instead of government debt, she says, investors should buy individual bonds, mainly corporate bonds rated BBB+ and above, which she says have a decent “spread,” or a positive interest rate difference, over Treasury bonds.

By buying individual bonds, she says, investors can lock in maturity and yield, and can avoid the problem in some bond funds of a declining dividend caused by investors stampeding into the funds, forcing the fund managers to buy lower-yielding securities.
“I would stay out of the Treasury market because the yields are too painfully low, and I would be very selective in buying good-quality corporate bonds, which are in an unbelievable sweet spot,” Cohen says.

The story is always the same. Concerns over a bubble, whether equities or bonds, are voiced, and the usual menu of solutions is offered as shown above. Even comparisons to certain similarities in the tech bubble of 2000 are noted.

However, sadly, none of these gentlemen quoted in this story has apparently learned anything from the last decade along with its two bear markets.

There is a time to be in and a time to be out. Why go through the mental agony and exercise of trying to decide whether certain bonds/bond funds/ETFs have a better chance of surviving a potential rate hike when and for whatever reason it occurs.

You’ve heard this before, so it here it is again. Simply follow the trends and implement a 5% trailing sell stop for all bond fund/ETF positions.

There is no guesswork involved and should this economy, against all expectations, continue to slip and slide, while bonds are continuing to rally, you will be the beneficiary.

If this current rally comes to an end, the trend reverses and triggers your trailing sell stops, then fine. You know exactly what your risk will be and chances are that you will be selling before most anybody will have figured out that a trend has ended.

Isn’t that a lot easier than trying to follow the so called experts, who have no more knowledge than you as to what the future will bring?

Hard Sell Stops vs. Soft Sell Stops

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

Several readers have commented recently that they too prefer the use of a soft sell stop vs. a hard one.

What’s the difference?

Hard sell stops attempt to get you out of a position at an exact predetermined figure. For example, if you bought an ETF at $10, your trailing sell stop of 7% would be at $9.30. If the markets get close to that number, you would place an intraday order with the idea that you want to get stopped out as close to that price as possible.

I have found that these types of hard sell stops can bring about a host of other problems, which I elaborated on in Front Runners.

Let’s use the same example from above for the use of a soft sell stop. In that case, I will not place my sell stop order intraday but wait for the closing price before making my decision.

If the closing price has clearly pierced the 7% level to the downside, I will then place my sell order the next day after verifying that there is not a huge rebound rally in progress. If there is, I will delay my decision for another day and thereby may have prevented a whipsaw signal.

That extra step eliminates participating in intraday “market noise” and avoids being subjected to front running activities.

No Load Fund/ETF Tracker updated through 8/19/2010

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

My latest No Load Fund/ETF Tracker has been posted at:

http://www.successful-investment.com/newsletter-archive.php

Worse than expected economic news handed the bears a win for the second week in a row.

Our Trend Tracking Index (TTI) for domestic funds/ETFs held above its trend line (red) by +2.48% (last week +2.30%) and remains in bullish mode.



The international index has now broken barely below its long-term trend line by -0.36% (last week -0.17%). A new Buy Signal was triggered 7/23/10 with the effective date being 7/26/10.

Be sure to use my recommended 7% trailing sell stop discipline, should you decide to participate in this new uptrend. An outright sell signal will be issued once the trend line gets pierced by -1.00%.



[Click on charts to enlarge]

For more details, and the latest market commentary, as well as the updated No Load Fund/ETF Tracker StatSheet, please see the above link.

Traveling

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

I’ll be traveling today and will not have a chance to write the daily commentary. Regular posting will resume with Friday’s week ending analysis.

Rebounding Off The Lows

Ulli Uncategorized Contact



The markets headed higher yesterday accelerating right out of the starting blocks without hesitation.

The 1,100 level on the S&P; 500 proved to be overhead resistance again, and we sold off that number in the afternoon as the rally faded on low volume, but it kept the major indexes on the plus side by over 1%.

While this rebound, after five days of losses, pushed the S&P; 500 back above its 50-day moving average by a slight margin, much more upward momentum is needed to restore faith in that this rally is nothing but another head fake.

Supporting the upside move were decent earnings news by Wal-Mart and Home Depot along with strength in manufacturing and less worry about Europe as Ireland was able to sell some $2 billion in bonds without any problems.

I would not read too much into any market moves until after Labor Day, since many Wall Street players are on vacation, which lowers the volume and exaggerates day to day activity. I expect this range trading to continue.