Rocking Mutual Funds

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

As you can imagine, with the markets having taken an unprecedented dive over the last few months, mutual funds have seen and outflow of assets as (hopefully) many investors realized that holding on to bullish funds in a bearish environment can be hazardous to your financial health.

MarketWatch reports that “Mutual-fund firms rocked by asset decline:”

After seeming to weather the worst of the credit storm, the mutual-fund industry has been getting walloped, losing more than 20% of assets under management in just five months.

Data from research firm Lipper show that as of Oct. 31, mutual funds of all types — stock funds, bond funds and money market funds — had $9.5 trillion in assets. That’s a 20.8% drop from where the industry stood on May 31 when it sported a record $12 trillion under management.

Mutual funds have lost 19.3% of their assets in the first 10 months of the year after closing 2007 with $11.7 trillion under wraps. This puts the industry on pace for one of the worst years in its history.

According to Lipper, since 1959 — the first year for which it has data — the largest year-on-year asset declines came in 1973, when assets dropped 20.4% to $3.4 billion, and 1974, when assets fell by 21.4% to $2.7 billion.
Mutual funds’ total assets were last below $10 trillion in December 2006.

The pain may not be over for the industry. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is down more than 10% in November, and there’s no reason to believe that investors are returning to the market.

“Funds are still going to have difficult periods to go through,” before things turn around, said Tom Roseen, senior analyst at Lipper. “We might not start seeing some people returning by next summer.”

Mutual funds have been whacked by a combination of falling asset values and redemptions. Average total returns of all stock funds, U.S. and international, are down 50% this year, causing the fall in asset values.

The sharp decline has also led to investors heading for the exits: October saw record dollar net monthly outflows from stock funds of $86 billion. The first 10 days of the month saw the Dow fall 28%.

Fixed-income funds also saw record dollar net outflows of $44.3 billion. The previous worst months of net outflows were September 1992, which saw $37 billion exit, and May 2004, when there were net outflows of $16.7 billion.

“Bond funds just got crushed,” in October, said Roseen, who added that much of the outflows were from investors leaving intermediate investment-grade debt. “People just don’t trust the ratings for these things any more,” he said.

Amid the carnage, money market funds have bounced back from the mid-September panic caused when Reserve Primary Fund “broke the buck” as its net asset value slipped below $1 a share.

That event caused a run on money market funds that saw $120 billion leave in one week but, buoyed by the Treasury’s guarantee program, the sector’s assets are now higher than they were before the panic as investors head into safer short-term debt. Treasury said on Monday that it was extending the insurance program until April 30.

Net inflows into money market funds in October were $169 billion, the second-largest on record, behind the $175 billion in net inflows in Aug. 2007 when concerns about the credit crisis first hit investors. “People are going for shorter durations, especially Treasury and government debt,” Roseen said.

But despite the brighter picture for money market funds, Roseen said 2009 could be just as tough as this year for mutual funds, citing both the experience of 1973 and 1974 — two bear-market years — and the early 2000s.

“Stock mutual fund returns in 2003 were 33.8% — the best since 1967 — but you saw very little in net inflows because people were still scarred by what had happened in 2001 and 2002,” he said. In those years, average total returns were down 9.3% and 17.8%, respectively.

This year, with average total returns down 50%, will likely leave even deeper mark on investors. Said Roseen: “This is a bad burn.”

I sure hope that investors have learned their lesson, although most likely at great costs, that bear markets are to be avoided no matter what. Since this one is, at least from my vantage point, just in the beginning stages, investors will want to make sure that a turnaround is the real thing before committing any serious money.

So forget the not so gentle nudges of the financial services industry that “stocks are cheap” or there are “good values out there” and focus on the direction of the long-term trend, which to me seems to be the only real thing in an economic environment where it’s almost impossible to distinguish between fact and fiction.

No Load Fund/ETF Tracker updated through 11/27/2008

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

My latest No Load Fund/ETF Tracker has been posted at:

http://www.successful-investment.com/newsletter-archive.php

This week, the bulls ruled and an impressive 5-day rally ensued.

Our Trend Tracking Index (TTI) for domestic funds/ETFs remains below its trend line (red) by -12.65% thereby confirming the current bear market trend.



The international index now remains -25.64% below its own trend line, keeping us on the sidelines.

For more details, and the latest market commentary, as well as the updated No load Fund/ETF StatSheet, please see the above link.

Happy Thanksgiving

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

After the bears celebrated an early Thanksgiving last week, the bulls got the upper hand this week by reversing some of the losses via a 4-day rally.

Even though the volume was light, it was an up move nevertheless. Amazingly, yesterday’s gains came in the face of bad economic news ranging from weak durable goods orders and the worst new-home sales report since 1991.

While the past 4 days helped those still invested to recoup some of their losses, the S&P; 500 is still down 8.4% for the month. If I were still exposed to the market, I’d take this opportunity to unload my holdings before the next leg down starts.

This bear market is far from being over in my opinion, although strong rebounds can cloud that picture and lure unsuspecting investors back into an invested position. While I am not sure if this is a structural bear market, take a look at the video below, which features technical analyst Louise Yamada:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2HIM3HFXXI]

Hanging In There

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

It was a see-saw day on Tuesday as the major averages struggled to hold on but managed to eke out a small gain.

The Fed’s announcement that it will buy up to $100 billion in debt issued by Fannie and Freddie was well received along with news of new efforts to ease strains in the consumer credit markets.

The new Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) is supposed to lend up to $200 billion to institutions issuing consumer debt such as credit card loan, student debt and auto loans. In other words, while the government will not make such loans directly, it supports them by buying them as asset backed securities from those who actually do the lending.

I am not sure if there will be strict guide lines or if this will be a step back into the history of real estate lending where the separation of loan originators and servicers brought about nothing but fraud and deception.

Due to the Thanksgiving holiday, I expect the markets to meander for the rest of this week until everyone is back full force on Monday.

Staying Neutral

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

The markets continued their rebound yesterday, which started on Friday, and pushed the major indexes up over 10% in two trading days.

Supporting cast was the rescue of Citigroup by the US Government along with optimism that President elect Obama’s assembled team will be qualified for the job.

The big unknown was how much of that rally was simply short covering to lock in profits from the recent decline. Over the past few months, we have seen this type of sharp rebound from a new low several times.

Trying to avoid this type of whip-saw activity is the reason why I have stayed away from using any inverse mutual funds/ETFs. The volatility is still too high and any short positions would have triggered their sell stop points just as any long positions would not have gone anywhere.

I will continue to stay neutral until some kind of trend can be identified.

A New Kid On The Block

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

As you can see from Friday’s chart, a new indicator, called the Global Dow, was recently added.

For some details as to what this index covers and how it has fared this year, MarketWatch featured this story:

The Global Dow launched on Tuesday — the first addition to the Dow Jones Averages family of indexes in 75 years.

Like its famous progenitor, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, stocks in The Global Dow are selected by senior editors of The Wall Street Journal. Joining them for this new index were Dow Jones Newswires senior editors in the three major regions of the globe.

WSJ’s Managing Editor Robert Thomson introduces the new international index, the Global Dow. (Nov. 11)But unlike the Dow everyone is familiar with, The Global Dow (GDOW) is much bigger — 150 stocks rather than 30 — and its components are weighted equally rather than by price. All 30 Dow industrial stocks are included in The Global Dow, as well as some from the Dow Jones Transportation and Utility averages.

The biggest difference, however, is in concept and purpose. The Global Dow tracks leading companies from around the world in all industries, selected not just for current size and reputation but also for their potential.

The Global Dow covers both developed and emerging markets, recognizing that far-flung areas of the world are becoming more closely linked and more interdependent, and that wealth creation is no longer concentrated in a few countries. In addition, it includes companies from emerging sectors, such as alternative energy.

While the index reflects the global stock market as it is today, in terms of industries and geography, care was taken to bring in some of what we think will be the leading global corporations of tomorrow.

There is another motivation for creating The Global Dow: More institutional investors are beginning to recalibrate their equity portfolios to a worldwide perspective. Some individual investors are, too. In the past, they usually placed 80% or more of their equity investment capital into domestic stocks and the remainder in “international” (outside their home country). But with the U.S. share of global market capitalization down from more than half several years ago to 46% as of Oct. 31, forward-looking investors are rethinking their allocations.

Our goal was to come as close as we could to replicating the makeup of the global market, using the Dow Jones Wilshire Global Total Market Index (tracking 12,769 stocks in 65 countries) as a guide. But we allowed ourselves some flexibility to accommodate our goals of including emerging markets and budding industries.

We succeeded in that The Global Dow fluctuates very similarly to the DJ Wilshire Global — 0.99 correlation over three years, with 1.0 being a perfect lockstep relationship. The Global Dow’s correlation over the same period to the Standard & Poor’s Global 100 (the competing index that on the surface seems to be the most similar) is 0.97.

But The Global Dow isn’t an exact mirror of the DJ Wilshire Global. The Global Dow is a bit underweight in the Americas (the U.S. is at 42% instead of 46%) and puts greater emphasis on Europe at 32% versus 27% for the DJ Wilshire Global. Asia/Pacific is a smidgen heavier in The Global Dow at 21% rather than 20%.

In developed/emerging terms, The Global Dow has 91% of its allocation to 20 developed markets (versus 93% in the DJ Wilshire Global) and 9% in five emerging countries (against 7%). The five are Brazil, China, India, Mexico and Russia. Dow Jones considers South Korea and Taiwan, both of which are represented in The Global Dow, as developed markets.

Of course, The Global Dow hasn’t escaped the current bear market. This year through Oct. 31, it is down 42.16% on a total return basis, compared with 40.69% for the DJ Wilshire Global and 35.94% for the S&P; Global 100. But back-testing shows The Global Dow with an annualized return of 10.47% over the five years ended Oct. 31, versus 2.62% for the DJ Wilshire Global and minus 0.36% for the S&P; Global 100.

With the financial crisis and global recession, this might appear to be a dubious time to introduce The Global Dow. But we’re doing so intentionally, so it can trace both the bottoming of world markets and their recovery.

[Emphasis added]

Before you get all excited about these new possibilities, read the last two paragraphs again. This index, just like any other, can do well in bull markets but is a loser when the bear rears its ugly head.

I am sure that an equivalent ETF will be added in the near future, and I will include it in my data base once enough historical data exists (about 9 months). That allows us to analyze its trends and momentum figures before it can even be considered a “buy” candidate at the time the next trend change occurs.