Where’s The Bull?

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

Bullish hopes were dashed yesterday when the markets did not follow through to the upside, but meandered downward with the Dow losing almost 300 points.

My contention has been all along that any intervention from the Fed or any government sponsored plan may evoke feelings of market euphoria, which will be short lived since the underlying issues of the Subprime/housing credit bubble are not are addressed and certainly not resolved. There are countless investment banks in the U.S. and worldwide that are bogged down with eventually having to write down more assets and clean up their balance sheets.

Until that happens, the markets are bound to remain in a trading range, with violent moves up and down. Given these underlying issues, I believe that the eventual breakout will occur to the downside. Once that direction has been confirmed, we will inch our way into bear market funds.

Yesterday’s retreat pushed our Trend Tracking Indexes (TTIs) further into bear territory with the domestic TTI being positioned below its long-term trend line by -1.22% while the international one sits below it by -10.30%.

There seems to have been a commodity shakeout yesterday (unwinding of large positions/increased margin reqirements) possibly because of the lofty levels many had reached. The volatility had picked up greatly last Monday which prompted me to liquidate our holding in the Commodity Index (DJP). Gold retreated as well, which was to be expected, but it did not reach our preset sell stop point.

My suggestion to remain in cash still holds. We currently only have a small exposure to gold and Swiss Francs.

Lift Off

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

Wall Street got almost all it was looking for from the Fed yesterday. A 75 bps reductions in rates was not quite the hoped for whisper number of 100 bps but good enough to send the markets into orbit in a repeat performance of last Tuesday.

Whether this exuberance will last is an entirely different question. Fundamentally, nothing has changed other than that the Fed has used up some more ammunition in an attempt to prop up the financial markets. Since my mode of operation is to look for and identify major trends, let’s peek at where our Trend Tracking Indexes (TTIs) stand after this monster rebound:

Domestic TTI: -0.17%
International TTI: -8.55%

While these indicators have obviously moved up from their bearish position, they are still stuck in neutral territory for the domestic area and remain bearish on the international side.

To me, a large one day rally, either up or down, is always suspect because it doesn’t really identify a current trend but merely reflects an enthusiastic reaction to a news event. Nevertheless, the S&P; 500 managed to wipe out its losses for the month of March with yesterday’s gain. We will remain mostly on the sidelines until a new major trend emerges.

Will The Fed’s New Loan Facility Work?

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

The Fed last week introduced another scheme called “Term Securities Lending Facility,” which allows it to lend to securities dealers on top of funds already injected in the system. I am losing count, but it appears to be the third attempt in the last few months to get a handle on the credit crises.

Bill Fleckenstein reflects on this latest attempt and while it is doomed to fail in his latest article. Here are some highlights:

I guess the sight of all those suffering hedge funds and brokers was just too much to bear.

Now, I realize the Fed was created to provide a liquidity backstop in times of emergency. But the Fed has abused its privilege for so long — by being the creator and proponent of excess liquidity and the problems it causes — that, in my book, the Fed is nothing short of an abomination. The reality that’s eluded Fed “experts” is simple: Credits in much of the financial system are simply no good. And creating liquidity and stalling for time won’t make those credits good.

I find it stunning that the Fed is willing to open up its tool kit when faced with liquidity problems — spawned from bubbles of its own making — and yet while those bubbles were inflating, the Fed kept it snapped shut tight.

This action by the Fed will temporarily alleviate some pressure, but it will not change the fundamental problem: Home prices were in a bubble that has now burst. People making median salaries in this country can’t afford to buy houses. And even folks who make more money often own more house than they can afford.

The Fed’s move set off a big rally on Wall Street, but it lasted just one day. This problem is going to run its course. There’s no bubble to bail out the housing bubble.

As to the folks who think commodities may be the next bubble: They might be right.

But exploding commodity prices will not help. They’re not going to make housing more affordable because less of people’s paychecks will be available for mortgage payments.

Before its implementation, the chance of the Fed buying a piece of paper that could deteriorate rapidly over the course of a couple of repo terms would have been small. But now that the Fed, through this facility, is willing to accept (exchange for Treasurys, actually) “AAA-rated” paper — and remember that the rating agencies are suspect — it’s not inconceivable that the following could occur:

The Fed might actually start taking paper at one price and then find out (by the time XYZ financial institution is supposed to take it back) that the paper is trading at a different price. Inquiring minds would like to know what the Fed would do about these losses if the repo’ing entity was determined not to take back the collateral.

Creating liquidity and stalling for time won’t make those credits good. Credit is contracting all across the financial system, in America as well as around the globe. At the same time, credits are going bad. Both of these problems keep lapping up against each other, and their magnitude will render bailouts useless.

Despite that glaring reality, the Fed remains intent on monetizing whatever needs to be monetized, as Chairman Ben Bernanke thinks this can prevent the underlying mass of home-price issues and the economic consequences of the burst housing bubble from doing what they will do.

But in the end, he’s going to shred the currency market and at some point the Treasury market. And, though Greenspan deserves all the blame, Bernanke will likely get it — with history erroneously declaring him to be the worst Fed chairman ever.

While the Fed’s attempt may postpone the inevitable, I agree with Bill that it will not solve the underlying problem that we’re in a housing/credit bubble that has burst and that bad debt is permeating through the entire financial system. No amount of Fed or government intervention will help companies survive long term if the bad debt issue is not addressed sooner rather than later.

Too Big To Fail?

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

The biggest news item last Friday and all weekend has been the collapse of Bear Stearns after their stock value got sliced in half.

Had it not been for the intervention of the Fed via JP Morgan, the markets would have tanked big time. To me, it was a clear case of a company being to big to let go because of the ramifications for all Wall Street firms. It’s not that Bear Stearns is the biggest player on Wall Street; they are big enough via their complex derivative trading schemes and tied in with many other investment banking firms that one failure would have had devastating effects on the other players as well.

I talked about this interconnectivity in “Counter Party Risk,” describing how leverage and derivatives have created a worldwide spider web tying international banks together in a scheme that will only hold if everyone sticks to their end of the bargain. If one fails, the domino effect can’t be calculated until the last domino has fallen since no one knows exactly who is tied into this web with how much capital or leverage. The Fed will be absolutely helpless because of the vast amounts of money involved.

I recently posted that derivative contracts are valued worldwide around $50 trillion. I guess I was wrong as recent reports put that number closer to $500 trillion. Mish over at Economic Trend Analysis made reference to the following chart from the Office of the Comptroller regarding derivative contracts (the comments are his, not mine):

click on chart to enlarge
These are mind boggling numbers and, based on the fact that all of these holdings are intertwined, one failure will cause many others to follow. Therefore it is simply in the best interest of the Fed and Wall Street in general, or the government for that matter, not to let anyone collapse.

However, given the enormous numbers involved, I have no idea what kind of a lifeline needs to be thrown to pull the participants out of this cesspool of worthless securities. But I do know that this environment can be extremely hazardous to your financial health if you haven’t sold your domestic and international equity funds. Events could now unfold at warp speed.

Sunday Musings: Staying Put?

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

Whenever financial markets slide into bear market territory, there are bound to be numerous articles appearing online or in print touting the “benefits” of staying put with your investments. It is as if nothing has been learned from the all too recent bear market of 2000-2003.

MarketWatch featured such a story titled “Grit and bear it.” Let’s look at some of the ideas:

Wall Street giant Bear Stearns is severely wounded and the natural instinct for many investors is to run, not just from financial-services stocks but from the entire market.

But the financial crisis that struck Bear Stearns Cos. Inc. on Friday — while the latest and possibly not the last shoe to drop in the widening credit crisis — is still no reason for investors to dump stocks and hide out in cash or Treasury bonds.

“It’s too late to be bearish, but it’s too early to be bullish,” said Bernard Baumohl, managing director of investment advisory firm The Economic Outlook Group LLC. “Until the dust settles, we’re advising clients to stay put.”

For Baumohl, a model portfolio today would be highly defensive — 40% cash; 50% stocks, mostly outside of the U.S.; and 10% in precious metals. But he wouldn’t suggest overhauling your own portfolio now to fit that cautious bill.

In fact, he expects to boost his clients’ allocation to stocks later this year.

“At this stage we are close to a bottoming in the stock market,” Baumohl said, “but it’s probably going to bounce around at the trough for at least another three to five months. It will be sometime until the second half of the year when finally people will jump back into the market and take advantage of the distressed prices.”

Of course, that’s small comfort now, with Bear Stearns on a precarious edge and investors anxious about what comes next.

“It’s a symptom of the entire financial-services sector,” said Michael Cuggino, manager of the Permanent Portfolio Fund. “I don’t think that ultimately Bear Stearns will be the only one to have this sort of thing occur. I don’t think they’re the only firm that can experience such liquidity crises.”

I just have to shake my head when reading such nonsense. Don’t these people realize that we are in bear market territory and may very well be witnessing the unwinding of the largest credit bubble ever created? Bear Stearns almost collapsed on Friday had it not been for a last minute Fed bailout. Without it, the ramifications for Wall Street might have been devastating. Next time, the Fed or any other while knight might not step in and then what?

These jokers in the above article are touting a model portfolio and talking about a bottom in the market. These stories are very similar to those I remember from late 2000.

My point about this ranting is simply that no one can foresee the future. Prices and price direction are the only things that are real because they can be measured. And right now, price direction points south meaning that if we continue in that direction, bullish portfolios will once again be annihilated.

I prefer reading qualified information from individuals with no axe to grind. I suggest you do the same and stay away from the nauseous repetitiveness of financial reality TV shows. While this may be great entertainment, be aware that’s all it is. My personal tolerance is about 5 minutes when watching botox enhanced individuals attempting to tell me what the market will do in the future or which mutual fund is a great buy.

Keep the big picture in mind; right now, the time is to be conservative and mostly on the sidelines.

Another One Bites The Dust

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

Not only have investments in Subprime slime wreaked havoc with banks and hedge funds, a ridiculous amount of leverage has made the problem far worse and added to the rather sudden demise of various institutions. The latest victim was Carlyle Capital, which went from recently owning some $22 billion in mortgage securities to now expecting that lenders will seize its assets.

Lenders are as much to blame for having to take possible losses since they provided Carlyle Capital with $20 for every dollar of initial capital. The mathematical formula is very simple:

Excessive Leverage + Subprime Investments = Collapse

I am sure that we will not have heard the last of this hedge fund debacle and there will be more to come despite S & P’s assurance that the “End of Subprime mortgage write-downs may be in sight.”

The operative word here is “may.” Yeah right, tip of the iceberg is more like it. Bear Stearns appears to be the next victim. What about the upcoming difficulties with Alt-A and Pay Option ARM mortgages, which are due to reset by the millions over the next few years. I hope I am wrong, but I am pretty sure that most financial institutions have not yet disclosed all of their potential write-downs.

On a positive subject, reader Bradley submitted the latest information on the federal tax rebate:

President George Bush said each one of us would get a $600.00 tax rebate. It was previously slated to be $800.00, but they dropped it to a $600.00 tax rebate because of various budget problems.

Now, if we spend that money at Wal-Mart, all the money will go to China, if we spend it on computers, most of the money will go to Korea or India.

If we spend it on gasoline it will all go to the Arabs—and none of these scenarios will help the American economy.

We need to keep that money here in America—so the only way to keep it here at home is to drink beer, gamble, or spend it on prostitution. Currently it seems that these are the only businesses still left in the U.S.

To that I am pleased to add that (former) NY Governor Spitzer is apparently leading this charge on the highest level to support these efforts.