Sunday Musings: Flawed Thinking

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

A couple of weeks ago MarketWatch featured the “Stupid Investment of the Week.” Here are some highlights:

When an investment company fires a fund manager, the typical pitch to shareholders is that they should stick around because better days must be ahead.

But if management gave up on a manager it trusted — and who lost the job presumably due to lagging performance — it may well be time for shareholders to head for the exits, too, particularly if they can find another fund that appears to be better suited for the job.

That’s precisely why it’s time for investors to give up on Janus Worldwide, which recently fired its manager after five years of struggling. While the move may ultimately make the fund more competitive, for the time being it only succeeds in making it the Stupid Investment of the Week.

Stupid Investment of the Week highlights the flawed thinking and tainted characteristics that make a security less than ideal for average investors, and is written in the hope that spotlighting danger in one case will make it easier to sidestep trouble elsewhere.

Unlike most investments featured in this column, there hasn’t been much of a buying case for Janus Worldwide for years. Even after a 45% loss in 2008, the fund still has $1.7 billion in assets, presumably left there by investors hoping for a return to glory.

In the late 1990s, Janus Worldwide was a bull-market media darling. The fund was run by manager Helen Young Hayes, one of the hot-shot gunslingers picking growth stocks and transforming Janus from small operation to mutual-fund powerhouse. A $10,000 investment made in Worldwide in 1996 was worth more than $33,000 when the stock market peaked in 2000.

As went the market, however, so went Worldwide. Three straight years of bear-market losses, with the fund in the bottom quarter of its peer group, tarnished the reputation. Hayes retired in 2003, replaced by her assistant who, in turn, was replaced by Jason Yee in July of 2004.

Yee was a rising star at Janus and big things were expected, but they were never delivered. According to Morningstar, Worldwide never was able to outperform its peers in the world stock fund category under Yee. Over the last five years, the fund has an annualized average loss of 6.8% and ranks in the bottom 10% of its peer group. Not surprisingly, both Morningstar and Lipper give Worldwide below-average marks in virtually every way they measure and weigh funds.

In short, it has fallen and can’t get up.

There is no doubt that international funds got clobbered during this past bear market, but to me that was not necessarily a function of bad stock selections as it was a function of market direction. Let’s be realistic, when a bear market strikes, all funds will go down.

Let’s take a look at Janus Worldwide and compare it to one of the investment darlings, namely Fidelity Diversified:



As you can see, they have mirrored each other pretty much over the past 2 years. That means no matter which fund you would have been invested in, the outcome of holding a bullish fund in a bearish scenario would have been the same: Heavy portfolio losses in the area of 50%.

That’s the issue the above article should have addressed. It’s not as important which fund you are invested in; it’s what you do when the market changes direction. Per our international Trend Tracking Index (TTI), which signaled a Sell on 11/13/2007 (see red arrow), you should not have held on to either fund.

This is why I keep harping on the same thing over and over when I read articles like the one above. It puts the cart before the horse by using whatever means to select a fund and then hope for the best.

To keep yourself out of trouble (translation: losing heavy), here’s the one-two-three punch in the investment selection process:

1. Determine the general trend of the market for the investment you are considering. If it’s bullish, go to #2; if it’s bearish, go to #3.

2. Select your investment from the choices available to you based on rising momentum numbers and establish an exit strategy after you have completed your purchases.

3. If the trend is bearish, don’t invest in a fund that prospers only in a bullish environment. Either stay on the sidelines or, if your risk profile permits, use an inverse fund/ETF to take advantage of a descending trend line.

Following these simple guidelines will put you in control of your investments and not the other way around. If you can become disciplined and follow a sell stop strategy, such as I recommend, you will at any given time know what your risk is as well as when to buy and when to sell.

Just making these adjustments to your approach of managing your portfolio will give you more peace of mind and let you sleep better at night.

Bulls vs. Bears

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

Sometimes it pays to look at the big picture to see where we have been, where we might be going and what has changed.

Doing that will at the same time also answer a frequently asked question, namely how much time does the domestic Trend Tracking Index (TTI) spend in bullish vs. bearish territory. As you know, for me, the dividing line between being bullish and bearish is the 39-week moving average of the TTI.

Looking back some 18 years, from 1/25/91 to 3/31/09, it turns out that the price line hovers above the trend line 68% of the time, while we spent 32% below it. That means, just about 2/3 of the time, the bulls were in charge.

But that does not tell the entire story. This period included the 90s, during which, for the most part, you could have thrown darts at the mutual funds pages of your daily newspaper and picked a winner.

Times have clearly changed since we moved into this century and with it the ratio of bullish to bearish periods. Take a look at the table above and note that from 1/1/2000 to 3/31/2009, we have only remained in the bullish zone 52% of the time vs. 48% in bear territory.

My guess is that by the time this current bear market is over, the ratio may have even turned further in favor of the bears.

This century has surprised us with 2 bear markets which, as a result, have caused the S&P; 500 to lose 42% from 12/31/1999 to 3/31/2009 with many portfolios following a similar descent. If this pattern continues and, investors along with advisors don’t adjust from creating only bullish portfolio scenarios, the consequences obviously will be dire.

Why bring it up?

For one, we are now spending more time on the sidelines since the bullish periods have been reduced from 68% to 52%, at least during the past 9 years. This ratio change would be even more extreme if I were to compare the 1990s to the 2000s.

While being on the sideline has been very rewarding in sidestepping the bear markets of 2000 and 2008, it has also made me look for alternatives to increase investment opportunities by using new products, some of which have only been available for a couple of years.

I am talking about ETFs, of course, and the more recent introduction of inverse products. They have led to the introduction of my SimpleHedge Strategy, which offers possibilities during the 48% of the time when the bears have the upper hand. I have recently expanded on these ideas further by testing successful hedges using China, the Emerging Markets and the BRIC countries. I will publish those results in due time.

To be clear, these additions do not mean that the basic premise of trend tracking has changed. Our goal still remains to track the major up trends and be invested in these bullish phases when the opportunities present themselves. On the other side, it is just as important that we continue to follow our sell stop discipline and be out of the market to avoid getting caught in severe bear market slides.

In the past 6 months alone, we have seen a rally of 20%, a subsequent drop of 24% and a rally again of some 26%, which are clear signs of violent bear market behavior and uncertainty as to the longer term direction. Those, who participated in all three scenarios have not made much headway in terms of portfolio gains but had to endure major emotional stress tests.

The battle of wits between bulls and bears will go on forever, and we have no control over it. What we do have control over is our investment approach, and I believe that the addition of the various hedge strategies will allow us to better deal with the ever changing market conditions.

No Load Fund/ETF Tracker updated through 4/23/2009

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

My latest No Load Fund/ETF Tracker has been posted at:

http://www.successful-investment.com/newsletter-archive.php

Despite sharp losses early in the week, the major indexes managed to claw back.

Our Trend Tracking Index (TTI) for domestic funds/ETFs remains below its trend line (red) by -2.82% thereby confirming the current bear market trend.



The international index now remains -4.09% below its own trend line, keeping us on the sidelines.

For more details, and the latest market commentary, as well as the updated No load Fund/ETF StatSheet, please see the above link.

Nothing But The Truth

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

Hat tip to reader Rob for pointing to a very fascinating interview between Bill Moyer and William Black, author of the the book “The Best Way To Rob A Bank Is To Own One.”

You can view the video at:

www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04032009/watch.html

It’s about 25 minutes in length, but I was so intrigued by what Bill Black had to say about the banking crisis, that it turned out to be time well spent.

Bill Black is the former senior regulator who cracked down on banks during the Savings & Loan crisis of the 80s, which makes him very qualified to to discuss current banking issues.

Hope you enjoy it as much as I did.

Tripling Down

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

Inverse funds and ETFs have made it easier than ever for investors to play the short end of the market. Even double and triple-leveraged funds have been around for a while, and recently Direxion has added another group to its ever growing stable as SeekingAlpha reports:

Direxion, the provider of revolutionary triple-leveraged exchange traded funds (ETFs), is out with a new set of funds. This time, they come with exposure to Treasuries.

These new funds allow investors to go three times long or short on 10-year and 30-year Treasury bonds, essentially making a bet on rates. The indexes give 300% the daily performance, or 300% the inverse, of the NYSE Current 10- and 30-year U.S. Treasury indexes.

The new funds are known as:

* Direxion Daily 10-Yr Treasury Bull 3x Shrs (TYD)
* Direxion Daily 30-Yr Treasury Bull 3x Shrs (TMF)
* Direxion Daily 10-Yr Treasury Bear 3x Shrs (TYO)
* Direxion Daily 30-Yr Treasury Bear 3x Shrs (TMV)

The current rate on a 10-year bond is 2.76%; on a 30-year, it’s 3.66%. Treasuries were mixed after Wednesday, and longer-term bonds saw their yields rise slightly, reports Nick Godt for MarketWatch. Signs of improvement in the economy, however slight, tend to decrease the appeal of U.S. government debt.

Adding to pressure on the debt is that foreigners sold another $97 billion in net U.S. assets in February, the second consecutive decline following a $146.9 billion drop in January.

Also, Direxion will be changing the name of all of its ETFs to include the word “daily,” to better reflect that these funds seek daily investment goals and should be used only as short-term trading vehicles. Leveraged ETFs have become more popular, and along with that has come attention. Leveraged and short ETF providers have done a great job of educating investors about these tools.

All of these leveraged instruments have the potential to turn an ordinary investor into a gambling fool. Caution is advised and, unless you know what you’re doing, you better stay away from these hot potatoes. Wild price swings in either direction can do a number on your psyche as well as on your portfolio value.

To me, these instruments are used best in combination with a hedge strategy. I am looking forward to these Treasury Bull and Bear ETFs to establish some volume and price pattern over the next few months, and I hope to find a use for these tools in combination with a hedged income generation appraoch.

Disconnect

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

The stock market has been in a total disconnect mode from economic reality over the past 6 weeks all based on the glimmer of hope that an economic turnaround may be lurking on the horizon over next 6 months or so.

It’s too early to tell if yesterday’s sharp sell off means that the markets have shifted back to reality mode, or if this was a one day interruption of the recent rally.

This past weekend, Dr. Housing Bubble had this to about Wall Street being disconnected from Main Street:

The stock market at least in its current form is a horrible indicator of the actual economic carnage falling upon the majority of Americans. Most Americans are witnessing the current rally and wondering why the massive run up (largely in financial related stocks) is going forward while they are getting called into supervisor offices behind closed doors and being laid off or seeing their hours cut back.

Wall Street has completely disconnected from Main Street. It is also hard for many to understand how they are having their limited income being taxed to finance the bailouts of Wall Street and financial cronies while they are asked to do more with less. They are seeing these same institutions, alive because of the massive funding from the American people since our government ideally should reflect the will of the majority, shut off credit lines and raise rates while the government through the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve showers the banks and Wall Street with easy low rate financing thanks to the American taxpayer. Welcome to the new America. Where unemployment is good news for Wall Street and bailouts are now seen as a new source of revenue for financial companies. New accounting students will learn how to incorporate bailout funds as a new source of revenue.

It is easy to turn a profit when trillions are funneled into the financial system. This is like jumping into the blue ocean and being shocked you got wet. Yet the problem of course is very little of this money is trickling down to the real economy; you know, the economy that doesn’t involve Bloomberg Terminals and pinstripe suits? Imagine a giant person eating at a table and the mice are running around on the floor hoping to pick up the scraps. Guess who the mice are?

The last few weeks have been great for the financial companies because they are now operating in a pseudo reality that is for the privileged few. These are the new financial overlords and all it took was the collapse of debt to show them for what they truly are. Many people for the last few decades have confused debt with actual wealth. That is a mistake we are now coming to terms with.

As always, Dr. Housing Bubble is right on with his observations, and I suggest you read the entire article if his viewpoints resonate with yours.

I still believe that this rebound over the past 6 weeks is a classic bear market rally. If you were fortunate enough to participate, and you regained some of your losses, you are well advised to implement some kind of sell stop discipline in case we are heading back south with the long-term bearish trend resuming its course.