Sell-Off Tsunami – International TTI Sell Signal Generated

Ulli Uncategorized Contact



A picture is worth a thousand words, even when the picture represents an ugly day on Wall Street. With the Dow being down almost 1,000 points at one time, losses were cut sharply during the last hour of trading.

Sure the Greek contagion was at the center of attention, but it appears that the latest news reports were not enough to create an outright panic.

Rumors of an incorrectly entered trade by a trader (working for a major firm), who mistyped a letter on a financial derivatives trade, may have very likely contributed to the extreme downside action by subsequently triggering other sell orders as preprogrammed machines were suddenly in charge. I’m sure we’ll find out more details as they become available.

Nevertheless, it was a down day, although I don’t give that much validity to a one-day wonder, whether it happens to the upside or the downside. As mentioned in yesterday’s post, we liquidated our emerging markets positions early this morning before the sell off stamped kicked into high gear.

Several other sell stops were triggered, and we will liquidate those tomorrow, unless the market stages a sharp rebound. At the same time, downside action was enough to trigger an outright sell signal for our International Trend Tracking Index, which covers “broadly diversified international funds/ETFs.”

The international TTI has now moved below its long term trend line and into bear market territory by -1.48%. All holdings in that arena should now be sold, although we no longer had any positions.

The domestic TTI resides still above its own trend line by +2.72%. I will post the updated charts tomorrow.

Trying To Claw Back

Ulli Uncategorized Contact



Despite a lower opening, the markets staged a mid-day comeback yesterday, but were unable to hold on to the advances as the chart above shows. Afternoon selling produced new lows for the day with the only positive being that we rallied off those lows towards the close.

As I mentioned yesterday, our emerging markets holdings did indeed break through their trailing stop loss points and, barring a huge turnaround today, will be liquidated. No other stops have been triggered.

While all eyes were still feasted on the Greek crisis, along with the potential of more fallout, the U.S. displayed more signs of an economic recovery. Positive figures from ADP showed, two days prior to the Labor Department’s payroll report, that the private sector added 32,000 jobs in April.

Additionally, the number of planned job cuts by U.S. employers fell 43% from the previous month, which is at least a step in the right direction.

Despite weeks of yapping to the contrary, warnings from the IMF and ECB of financial contagion in the euro zone from the Greek debt crisis were heard loud and clear and added to market uncertainty. Any default would add risks to the stability of the monetary union and could jeopardize the future of the euro.

Be that as it may, we have no control over those events, so we will focus on the things that we can control, which is the execution of our sell stops. This topic has been discussed at length via dozens of blog posts over the past year.

In case you missed it, I have compiled these in a 70-page e-book, which you can download for free right here.

The Return Of Volatility

Ulli Uncategorized Contact



Monday’s feel-good-rally after Friday’s drubbing died at the opening yesterday as prices gapped down and never recovered.

Despite a rise in pending homes sales and positive Merck and Pfizer earnings, all eyes were feasted on the Greek bailout and the increased concern that the Greek government would fail in getting its debt problem under control and force another bailout package.

Coupling that with the fact that Portugal, Spain and Ireland are waiting in the wings with similar problems, simply created an unknown that the markets were unable to handle. You can read more on that topic here.

The euro was the whipping boy of the day, while the dollar rallied and supported our positions in UUP. There was no place to hide, so UUP turned out to be the only bright spot on the computer screen.

In terms of our trailing sell stops, none were triggered, but the emerging markets moved within shouting distance and will be monitored closely. As I posted in “Running Out Of Steam,” the emerging markets were the leaders on the way up as this buy cycle began, and it appears that they will be leading on the way down as well.

Not For The Long Term

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

The use of leverage has always intrigued investors to increase returns despite the increased downside risk. The ETF arena features a stable of 2X and 3X leveraged funds covering various areas.

The fact that some of these sport high daily trading volumes supports their popularity. For example TNA (3X bullish S&P; 500) has an average daily trading volume of $500 million while SDS (2X bearish S&P; 500) has over $1 billion.

If you are an aggressive investor, who wants to play with fire, there are a few things you need to know as ETF Trends reports in “Spice Up Your Portfolio With Leveraged ETFs:”

* Returns are only meant to reflect the daily performance of a fund’s underlying index. Each day, these ETFs “reset” and over time, this can lead to a fund not staying in perfect line with its benchmark.

* In normal markets, this effect can work in your favor. In volatile markets, the compounding effect is exacerbated and the longer you hold a fund, the further it may stray from its benchmark.

* These funds are meant for daily use; if you hold them longer, just be aware that there may not be a 1-to-1 tracking of the underlying benchmark.

I believe that these ETFs are suited only for the most aggressive investors with deep pockets. The speed with which you can make or lose money during fast moving markets boggles the mind. I have one well capitalized client who likes to “play” with some of these ETFs and making or losing $50k can often happen in minutes.

It’s a trader’s paradise but a long-term investor’s nightmare. Stick to what you are comfortable with and leave the high risk ETFs for those who have the stomach and the funds to handle a wild ride.

Battle In the High Yield Arena: ETFs vs. Mutual Funds

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

While ETFs continue to be the hottest investment tool, much to the chagrin of mutual funds, when it comes to the high yield arena, they are still a worthy competitor as ETF Trends submits in “High-Yield ETFs vs. High-Yield Mutual Funds:”

Exchange traded funds (ETFs) may have siphoned billions of investment money out of mutual funds in the past year, but when it comes to high-yield bonds, mutual funds are bringing a competitive game.

Some of the benefits high-yield ETFs enjoy over similar mutual funds include:

* Similar to the ETF offerings, mutual funds that offer access to high-yield debt also track a select basket of low-grade corporate debt. However, the mutual fund offerings take an active approach while HYG and JNK are designed as passive products.

* Mutual funds rely on the know-how of their managers, which means higher expense ratios. Mutual fund expense ratios can exceed 1.0% and can incur short-term fees for shares held less than 90 days.

* The higher fees also mean that the mutual funds pay out lower yields.

* Mutual funds lack intraday liquidity, transparency and frequently have hefty investment minimums, as well.

When it comes down to total returns, leading high-yield mutual funds have recorded total returns of up to 20% in the past two years, whereas JNK and HYG have provided 12.8% and 11.1%, respectively.

Still, HYG and JNK are better for short-term trades because of their transparency, ability to trade throughout the day and lack of short-term trading fees. Mutual funds may be the better choice for long-term investing due to their total return outperformance.

To be clear, this is not a matter of pitting mutual funds against ETFs, but simply a matter of selecting the tool that’s most appropriate for you. Due to the ever present market volatility, my preference for generating income is ETFs, especially after the market run of the past year. While more upside potential still exists, at these levels, the risk of a correction has increased quite a bit.

Keep in mind that high-yielding ETFs and mutual funds will follow the general direction of the market. Take a look at this 2-year chart showing JNK and HYG compared to SPY (S&P; 500):

As you can see, during the meltdown of 2008, JNK and HYG did better than SPY, but holding on to these and seeing your principal deteriorate by some 40% will not give you the warm fuzzies, despite a 10% yield.

In my view, income funds/ETFs need to be treated just like equity funds/ETFs in that their trends need to be tracked, and a sell stop has to be used in the same fashion to protect your downside risk.

Disclosure: We have holdings in JNK

Sunday Musings: The Greek Crisis And Stock Market Trends

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

The Greek debt crisis has been a factor in affecting the direction of world stock markets, at least for the time being.

While no one can predict what the true long-term consequences will be, there have been similar fallouts in history that might give a clue.

Mark Hulbert had some thoughts on this topic in “Tragedy or Comedy?”

The difference between a tragedy and a comedy, I was taught in Classics 101, is that, in the latter, the hero wakes up in time.

I take this to mean that it’s premature to label the current fiscal crisis in Greece as a tragedy, as many commentators nevertheless are already doing. It might in the end turn out to be a tragedy, but it doesn’t have to.

This is especially worth remembering after a day in which the stock market plunged as Greece’s debt was freshly downgraded (this time to “junk” status). The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by more than 200 points, or 1.9%. The S&P; 500 had an even worse day in percentage terms, shedding 2.3%.

But investors can’t really have been all that surprised by the downgrade of Greek debt — or at least shouldn’t have been. John Dessauer, editor of an investment advisory service called John Dessauer’s Outlook, argued in an interview last week that it was almost certain that Greece would end up defaulting on its sovereign debt, either outright or de facto.

In any case, Dessauer furthermore argued, the impact on the world economy of an outright Greek default would be fairly modest. That’s because the damage to world trade inflicted by the Greek crisis has already happened — and for the most part has been already priced into the level of the stock market.

Dessauer’s point is confirmed by a recent analysis I conducted of the stock market’s reaction to past sovereign debt crises. Interestingly, Greece’s sovereign debt crisis is hardly unique. And the stock market on average has performed quite well in the wake of past such crises.

Over the last two decades, I counted at least four major sovereign debt crises:

* The Mexican peso devaluation and associated crisis, which began in December 1994.

* The so-called “Asian Contagion” that began in July 1997, when a government debt crisis in Thailand led to a run on its currency. That in turn precipitated similar crises throughout the region, leading many to fear that the crisis might eventually spread around the world.

* The Russian ruble devaluation in August 1998, which led to (among other things) the bankruptcy of Long-Term Capital Management

* The Argentine government debt/currency crisis that began in November/December 2001

The accompanying chart is based on a composite of how the stock market reacted following all four cases, with 100 representing the stock market’s level when those crises first broke onto the world financial scene. On average the stock market was 17% higher in one year’s time (as measured by the Wilshire 5000 Total Market Index).

The chart also shows how, on the same scale, the stock market has reacted so far to the Greek crisis. Notice that, more or less, the stock market is following a similar script. In fact, even with Tuesday’s big drop in the stock market, it nevertheless remains ahead of the average experience in the wake of the four prior debt crises.

This analysis doesn’t amount to a guarantee that the stock market will perform as well this time around, needless to say. There is a big leap of faith involved in extrapolating from this — or any — historical analysis, especially one based on a sample containing just four examples.

Still, this analysis does serve to remind us that the negative impact of a sovereign debt crisis, scary as it otherwise may be, can also be exaggerated.

At the same time, you are well advised not to make hasty investment decisions just because a crisis has affected markets temporarily. The next one will be lurking on the horizon for sure, so it pays to stay with your strategy, as long as the major trends remain up and your sell stop points have not been violated.

It’s important to remember that once a negative event becomes known, any further consequences are likely priced in the markets already and will have less of an effect than initially. It’s the unexpected that can wreak havoc on Wall Street, at least temporarily.

That’s why it’s most beneficial for you as an investor to keep your emotions in check, let the markets do what they do, but have a plan in place to deal with a change in trend direction by using your sell stops to get your portfolio out of harm’s way.