The Rally That Wasn’t

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

In a repeat performance similar to what we’ve witnessed so many times over the past few months, the markets turned an early intraday 140 point gain of the Dow into a losing session starting the week on a negative note.

The losses were modest, so not much should be read into them. The driver for the morning rally was the Chinese announcement that it will loosen its currency peg to the dollar; not by a huge change, but at least it was interpreted as a step in the right direction after two years of being locked in a rigid position.

However, global debt problems surfaced later on in the day, the dollar rallied (supporting our long position) and south we went. Our domestic Trend Tracking Index (TTI) moved only slightly and remains +2.19% above its long-term trend line.

Upward momentum from last week’s rally seems to have stayed intact as all major indexes are remaining above their 200-day moving averages.

More ETF Price Cutting

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

I am all in favor of lower fees when it comes to investment products. Charles Schwab & Co. (my custodian) has again upped the ante in “ETF deals get even better as Schwab cuts prices in price war:”

Maybe the day will come when they will pay you to buy ETFs. That will be a great day, but don’t count on it.

Still, a price war between ETF — or exchange traded fund — providers is working in the individual investor’s favor. It is making ETF investing pretty cheap.

Schwab and Fidelity lets people buy some ETFs for free, without paying commissions — or the fee you get charged when you buy or sell a security. And Vanguard has made their full fleet of ETF’s commission-free. Now, competition is also extending to the fees you get charged day in and day out for the management of the ETF itself. Schwab announced that it has cut the fees — or expense ratios — in a handful of ETFs it has created.

For example, Schwab has cut expenses in its broad market fund from .08 percent to .06 percent and in its emerging market fund from .35 percent to .25 percent.

Fees matter. They are the one thing an investor can control and over years of investing higher fees can reduce your return by thousands of dollars. Still, as you pick ETFs remember that it’s important to have a diversified portfolio — with bonds, for example, in addition to stocks. So don’t just limit yourself to the cheapest ETFs if that means skipping the full blend of funds you need. In addition, you want funds large enough to allow you to trade in and out easily without paying higher trading costs. And you want to notice what stocks or bonds are in the funds, because those with ETFs with similar names aren’t always similar.

Here’s the fee comparison chart:

While price reductions are always a step in the right direction, do not make this your main criteria when selecting ETFs. For example, while Schwab’s S&P; 500 equivalent (SCHX) has no commission and the lowest management fee (0.08%), the average daily volume is around $6 million, which makes it suitable only for small investors. Compare that to SPY, the largest ETF in the universe with over $25 billion being traded daily.

When the markets correct, and the exit doors get crowded, you do not want to get caught holding a low volume ETF. Commissions or no commissions, slightly higher annual fees or lower ones, it does not matter; when you need to exit in a hurry based on changes in the trend, or your sell stops being triggered, only volume matters.

Sunday Musings: A Personal View

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

Reader Mel emailed the following comment:

For some reason I was blocked from commenting on today’s blog. Here’s what I wanted to say, and you can feel free to post it:

As always, I’m grateful for your posts, including the ones that re- post something interesting from elsewhere, but in this case I was especially interested in your comments. I know you’ve been an American long since, but you do have a former insider’s view of Europe and especially Germany, and I hope you’ll write more about the mood and thoughts of Europeans, especially the ever-pivotal Germans, as this crisis unfolds for better or for worse. You can surely do this more authoritatively than most Americans.

I’d be particularly interested in your evolving views of the Euro- style welfare state–whether you were always a skeptic, whether you think it can survive in some form, how different we are if we have such a heavy burden of future obligations anyway, etc., etc.

First, as you may have noticed, a few weeks ago I disabled the anonymous posting function due to abuse and ever increasing spam attempts. While you can still post, you need to identify yourself.

A quick check of other blogs dealing with economic/investment issues confirmed that most do not offer anonymous posting—very likely for the same reasons. If you wish to remain anonymous, you can always email me with any questions, and I’ll address those in future posts.

Second, in regards to my view of Europe, or Germany in particular, I must admit that I have been gone for a long time (35 years) and at times feel like that I am on the outside looking in. Nevertheless, every time I visit, I seem to become reacquainted with their way of life fairly quickly.

The most obvious difference I notice every time is the much more conservative behavior of the consumer. Despite the fact that purse strings have been loosened quite a bit, the overriding desire and priority number one is still to save money first.

This was confirmed during my recent visit when it was announced on the business channel that the average German nowadays saves 15% of his net income every month. That’s truly an impressive number and certainly does not contribute to any reckless spending sprees such as are/were common here in the U.S.

Additionally, some frugality or new thinking seems to have even struck one of the most unlikely places, the German government. During the recent G-20 meeting, I read on Bloomberg that Chancellor Merkel uttered these words “we can only spend what we receive in income.” Certainly that is not an attitude that Treasury Secretary Geithner wanted to hear, since he seems to be operating more in line with ‘spend now and worry about pay backs later.’

My point is that Germany, along with most other European countries, is forced to initiate austerity programs to varying degrees, which will not bode well from a U.S. or Asian export point of view, since it will most certainly limit/reduce future consumption and not increase them. Subsequently, global economic output will suffer down the line, which eventually will affect stock markets around the world.

Future debt obligations are a problem in Europe just as they here and in most industrialized nations. For a comical view of how Europe got into this mess, hat tip goes to reader Robert, who sent in the video below. Enjoy!

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brb8u0WV9ZA]

Out For The Day

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

I am out for most of the day and will not have a chance to post. However, I will resume tomorrow with Sunday Musings.

No Load Fund/ETF Tracker updated through 6/17/2010

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

My latest No Load Fund/ETF Tracker has been posted at:

http://www.successful-investment.com/newsletter-archive.php

Tuesday’s strong up move held, and the major indexes not only gained for the week, but also stayed above their 200-day moving averages.

Our Trend Tracking Index (TTI) for domestic funds/ETFs remains above its trend line (red) by +2.46% (last week +1.38%) keeping the current buy signal intact. The effective date was June 3, 2009.



The international index has now broken below its long-term trend line by -0.49% (last week -2.83%). A Sell Signal was triggered effective May 7, 2010. We are no longer holding any positions in that arena.

[Click on charts to enlarge]
For more details, and the latest market commentary, as well as the updated No load Fund/ETF StatSheet, please see the above link.

Holding Steady

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

The best thing that can be said about yesterday’s market activity is that the solid gains from Tuesday held as you can see from the above chart (courtesy of MarketWatch.com).

There were no additional catalysts to speak of so volume was fairly light, but the important event was that the S&P; 500 closed the day above its 200-day moving average for the second day in a row confirming investor confidence.

Since a selloff did not happen, I committed about 1/3 of portfolio value (depending on client risk tolerance) to broad domestic indexes as mentioned yesterday. I consider the downside risk fairly small at a level of about 4%.

Here’s how I arrived at that number.

Our domestic Trend Tracking Index (TTI) is currently positioned +2.27% above its long term trend line. If the major indexes head south from here, it would take a drop of only about 4% of the broad market to pierce the trend line to the downside generating an all-out sell signal.

Because of our proximity to the trend line, this would happen prior to our conventional 7% trailing sell stop being triggered—hence the reduced risk.