No Load Fund/ETF Tracker updated through 5/15/2008

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

My latest No Load Fund/ETF Tracker has been posted at:

http://www.successful-investment.com/newsletter-archive.php

Upside momentum pushed our domestic Trend Tracking Index out of the neutral zone and into buy mode effective Thursday, May 15, as announced.

Our Trend Tracking Index (TTI) for domestic funds/ETFs has now moved to +2.63% above its long-term trend line (red):



The international index improved but remains -0.78% below its own trend line, keeping us still on the sidelines.



For more details, and the latest market commentary, as well as the updated No load Fund/ETF StatSheet, please see the above link.

Domestic Buy Signal Generated

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

Today’s tame CPI report (+0.20% vs. an expected +0.30%) provided enough ammunition for the bulls to drive the major indexes higher. As details about the CPI report became public, namely that gasoline prices fell 1.8% in April, the trading floor erupted with laughter. That goes to show that traders have a sense of humor just like you need to have if you hear numbers like that.

Although the rally faded during the afternoon session (see MarketWatch chart above), the gains were enough to keep our domestic Trend Tracking Index (TTI) above the neutral range with a reading of +1.72%, unchanged from yesterday’s close.

This now constitutes a new Buy signal for diversified domestic equity funds effective tomorrow, Thursday. While we can never be sure if this trend will continue, I will now ease into the market with about 1/3 of portfolio value. Most important after the purchase are my stop loss points.

I will use a 7% trailing stop loss on all positions on a day-end closing price only. Therefore, a sell signal will be generated, if my holdings violate the stop loss points or if the domestic TTI drops below the lower range of the neutral zone, which is a point -1.50% below its long-term trend line, whichever occurs first.

I will post further updates as necessary.

Staying Above The Neutral Zone

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

Despite a pullback in the market on Tuesday, the domestic Trend Tracking Index (TTI) managed to stay above the upper range of the neutral zone. Its position is now +1.72% above its long-term trend line. If the TTI can remain above the +1.50% level for another trading session, a domestic Buy will be validated, and we will move back into the domestic arena with about 1/3 of our portfolios.

Right now, it appears that the path of least resistance is to the upside, as the past few weeks have shown. Barring any unexpected negative news with the announcement of Wednesday’s CPI, we may find ourselves back in domestic equities in a couple of days.

Upside Breakout—Again

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

Here we go again. Yesterday’s rally erased pretty much all of Friday’s losses and pushed our domestic Trend Tracking Index (TTI) back out of the neutral zone.

The domestic TTI has now moved to +1.83% above its long-term trend line, slightly above the upper range of the neutral zone (defined as a level of +1.50% above its trend line).

Again, if this level holds for a couple of trading days, it will constitute a domestic Buy, and we will move back into that market.

Internationally, nothing changed as the international TTI still remains -2.29% below its long-term trend line.

Types Of Risks

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

MarketWatch featured a story called “Point of no return,” which questions whether risk taking is worth the emotional cost for many investors.

Eight different types of risks are examined with the premise that there more of these are faced in a portfolio, the more diversified it is:

Let’s look at the types of risks mentioned:

1.Market risk is the big bugaboo, the chance that a downturn chews up your money.

2.Purchasing power risk, or “inflation risk,” is widely considered to be the “risk of avoiding risk” — the opposite end of the spectrum from market risk. It’s the possibility that you are too conservative and your money can’t grow fast enough to keep pace with inflation.

3. Interest-rate risk is a key factor in the current changing rate environment, where income may change drastically when a bond or CD matures and you need to reinvest the money. Goosing returns using higher-yielding, longer-term securities creates the potential to get stuck losing ground to inflation if the rate trend changes again.

4. Shortfall risk is about you, personally, more than it is the market, but it’s the chance that you won’t have enough money to make your goals. You can face shortfall risk by being either too conservative or too aggressive. The best way to address this risk is to save more.

5. Timing risk is another another highly personal factor, hinging on your personal time horizon. While experts agree that the chance that stocks will make money over the next two decades is high, the prospects for the next two years are murky, and if you need your money in two years, you should have concerns about your timing.

6. Liquidity risk has been the underlying issue in the mortgage and credit crunch, and it affects everything from junk bonds to foreign stocks. When the flow of money in credit markets changes for any extended period of time, holdings in those credit arenas tend to suffer.

7. Political risk is the prospect that government decisions will impact the value of your investments. In the current political environment, investors should worry about how the change at the White House may lead to new tax policies, which could trickle down directly into the pocketbook for investors. Tax-rule changes could make certain types of investments popular, and make others unattractive, and there’s always the potential to be caught somewhere in the middle.

8. Societal risk is ultra-big picture, looking at world events. This is what might happen in the event of terrorist attacks, war or catastrophe.

The theme of the story is is that “diversifying across the spectrum of risks — particularly pursuing investments that face different conditions so that their success or failure is not all tied to the same market characteristics — is widely considered the best way to build a portfolio that can be depended on in all circumstances.”

Sure diversification is an important part of any portfolio—up to a point. As recent market history has shown (as well as the last bear market), we are living in an era of instant communication and economic intertwinement where as a result a receding tide affects all ships. I have commented on that a year ago in “Where is the safe Haven,” as all asset classes took severe beatings.

Yes, diversification is important, but from my viewpoint it is not nearly as critical as having a defined entry and exit strategy designed to reduce volatility and protect a portfolio from severe downturns. Remember, most diversification attempts are based on a bullish (buy & hold) scenario, which can have severe consequences if the markets head the other way.

Sunday Musings: Using The Numbers To Suit Your Needs

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

You may recall my book review last June with the title “Why Business People Speak Like Idiots.”

I am reminded of the stupid statements being pushed on to the public almost daily. One in particular that caught my eye a couple of days ago was a blurb by the WSJ MarketBeat called “AIG Slumps…If One Believes in Numbers.” Let’s listen in:

Beware of companies that find new ways to value assets while they’re sinking.

Where have we heard this story before? A company loses a bundle of money due to depressed values for its assets, and it says those valuations don’t really count.

That’s what has happened to American International Group Inc. today in its conference call, and not for nothing, but instead of bouncing in the aftermath of the company’s chat with analysts, the stock is tailing off, lately hitting its worst level of the day, down 8%.

The company lost $7.8 billion in the quarter. During the conference call, Steven Bensinger, vice chairman at the company, noted that the $19.3 billion unrealized loss estimate in one of its pools of collateralized debt obligations doesn’t jibe with their analysis, which should suggest a loss of $1.2 billion to $2.4 billion.

Naturally, the estimate to be ignored is the one based on accounting principles, as the company says that “during the first quarter of 2008 AIG developed a new methodology to estimate more precisely its potential realized losses from this portfolio.” Naturally, this new methodology “lowers” the “potential realized losses.”

They also ignore a third-party estimate of $9 billion to $11 billion in losses in this particular portfolio, saying “but because of the disruption in the marketplace we continue to believe that a market-based analysis is not the best methodology to use as a predictor of AIG’s potential realized losses.” Floyd Norris of the New York Times says the company is in denial, at a time when most institutions (even Citigroup) have tried to move past alchemy-based valuation techniques.

For financial institutions, it seems lower housing valuations (as determined by a market) are enough to alter lines of credit, raise certain interest rates or change insurance and loan terms. But market-based analyses of their own portfolios? Obviously hogwash.

Some analysts recently suggested that the improvement in certain credit markets in the second quarter would offset some of the first-quarter losses, and AIG mentioned this in the conference call, saying the commercial mortgage-backed securities market has improved, but that the residential mortgage and subprime securities have not. Still,
the firm says the ABX Index (which some believe does have problems) “is not very well correlated to our books,” and therefore should also be ignored.

Another odd wrinkle, and maybe this is just a confidence ploy, is this: the company has decided to raise its dividend. The insurance giant is going to raise $12.5 billion in capital, some of which will then be used…to pay current shareholders more money. They’re borrowing from Peter to pay Peter, really. Mike Shedlock of Sitka Capital wrote recently of companies borrowing money to pay dividends. “It does not make economic sense to borrow money at 8% to pay a dividend of 5%,” he writes, surmising that perhaps there would be an adverse reaction if dividends were cut.

AIG apparently feels this way, but it isn’t working so far. Bank of America analysts wrote in research today that “over time, we believe the company will have to dial down its leverage and risk profile, which is likely to put pressure on operating earnings.”

[Emphasis added]

I have to admit, reading this left me pretty much speechless. I can’t remember ever having heard this much denial, numbers manipulation and BS by one company since maybe the Enron days.

This type of garbage is being unleashed on the public almost daily, maybe not to that extreme; however, if you invest in individual stocks (I don’t) and follow their news releases, make sure you understand what is really being said.

If I were a stockholder in AIG, I would definitely review my reasons for having invested in this company in the first place.