My latest No Load Fund/ETF Tracker has been posted at:
http://www.successful-investment.com/newsletter-archive.php
Up, up and away was the mantra as all major indexes gained for the third week in a row.
Our Trend Tracking Index (TTI) for domestic funds/ETFs remains below its trend line (red) by -5.14% thereby confirming the current bear market trend.
The international index now remains -11.39% below its own trend line, keeping us on the sidelines. 
From TARP To GARP
Much has been written about the various bailout packages more recently referred to as TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program), which should now be renamed to GARP (Geithner Asset Relief Program).
Both have one thing common in that enormous amounts of money are being spent without any certainty that positive results can be achieved. My confidence level in these programs, which was almost non-existent to begin with, was pulled down another notch yesterday, when Treasury Secretary Geithner uttered the words before congress that “it only requires will; it’s not about ability.” Yeah right.
To really understand how these plans work, take a look at a humorous description as submitted by reader Tom:
Heidi is the proprietor of a bar in Berlin. In order to increase sales, she decides to allow her loyal customers – most of whom are unemployed alcoholics – to drink now but pay later. She keeps track of the drinks consumed on a ledger (thereby granting the customers loans).Word gets around and as a result increasing numbers of customers flood into Heidi’s bar. Taking advantage of her customers’ freedom from immediate payment constraints, Heidi increases her prices for wine and beer, the most-consumed beverages. Her sales volume increases massively. A young and dynamic customer service consultant at the local bank recognizes these customer debts as valuable future assets and increases Heidi’s borrowing limit.
He sees no reason for undue concern since he has the debts of the alcoholics as collateral. At the bank’s corporate headquarters, expert bankers transform these customer assets into DRINKBONDS, ALKBONDS and PUKEBONDS. These securities are then traded on markets worldwide. No one really understands what these abbreviations mean and how the securities are guaranteed. Nevertheless, as their prices continuously climb, the securities become top-selling items.
One day, although the prices are still climbing, a risk manager (subsequently of course fired due his negativity) of the bank decides that slowly the time has come to demand payment of the debts incurred by the drinkers at Heidi’s bar.
However they cannot pay back the debts. Heidi cannot fulfill her loan obligations and claims bankruptcy. DRINKBOND and ALKBOND drop in price by 95%. PUKEBOND performs better, stabilizing in price after dropping by 80%.
The suppliers of Heidi’s bar, having granted her generous payment due dates and having invested in the securities are faced with a new situation. Her wine supplier claims bankruptcy, her beer supplier is taken over by a competitor. The bank is saved by the Government following dramatic round-the-clock consultations by leaders from the governing political parties. The funds required for this purpose are obtained by a tax levied on the non-drinkers.
There you have it. A perfect explanation how a useless asset is being securitized and sold, large amounts of money are being made in the process and, ultimately, innocent bystanders are being asked to ante up via tax dollars.
Timing The Hedge
Several readers have emailed over the past few days requesting some details about the execution of the hedge trades.
The issue is when setting up the hedge by purchasing SH for the short side and mutual funds for the long side, which order do you place first on days when the markets rally sharply?
This certainly was the case on Monday as all major indexes shot into the stratosphere. On Monday morning, you could have placed your (long) mutual fund orders to be filled at that day’s ending prices.
But what about SH? Entering the order and getting it filled early or at mid-day would have exposed you to losses as the market rallied on.
I was caught in that exact position. Due to a prior commitment, I had to leave the office about an hour before the markets closed. At that point, the rally was on and the Dow was up some 300 points and rising. My plan had been to simply enter the short position as close to closing time as possible to limit any adverse price action.
Since that was not possible, I simply postponed any action and will enter my long and short positions on a day when I will be around at closing time.
I suggest you follow a similar pattern so that you don’t enhance the odds of starting your hedge with a slight loss.
Feeding The Bulls
Treasury Secretary Geithner fed the bulls yesterday by announcing the details of his latest plan to stimulate the financial system.
Much already has been written about it as the particulars are being dissected in any possible way.
The markets took this as a positive development and off the races we went with all major indexes gaining sharply.
As always, Mish at Global Economics provided some valuable insights as to this new spending plan in “Geithner’s Galling (and Dangerous) Plan For Bad Bank Assets.” If you’re not interested in all the gory details, here’s a summary about five misconceptions:
* The trouble with the economy is that the banks aren’t lending. The reality: The economy is in trouble because American consumers and businesses took on way too much debt and are now collapsing under the weight of it.
* The banks aren’t lending because their balance sheets are loaded with “bad assets” that the market has temporarily mispriced. The reality: The banks aren’t lending (much) because they have decided to stop making loans to people and companies who can’t pay them back.
* Bad assets are “bad” because the market doesn’t understand how much they are really worth. The reality: The bad assets are bad because they are worth less than the banks say they are.
* Once we get the “bad assets” off bank balance sheets, the banks will start lending again. The reality: The banks will remain cautious about lending, because the housing market and economy are still deteriorating. So they’ll sit there and say they are lending while waiting for the economy to bottom.
* Once the banks start lending, the economy will recover. The reality: American consumers still have debt coming out of their ears, and they’ll be working it off for years.
What it comes down to is that another $1 trillion or so will be poured down this bottomless sinkhole for which the next few generations get to pay as the taxpayers are on the hook for 93% of this plan’s obligations.
Since we do not any influence over the outcome, we have to focus on the effects as far as the market is concerned. Over the next few days, we will see if there will be any follow through to the upside or if this rally is limited in scope.
While our domestic Trend Tracking Index (TTI) is still 5.09% away from signaling a new Buy, we nevertheless have to be prepared to act should this trend continue. Entering via our hedge position is only the first step to gaining market exposure conservatively. We will become more aggressive once the trend line has been crossed to the upside.
Lower Mutual Fund Fees Ahead?
Another law suit is brewing as “Supreme Court could cut mutual fund expenses:”
The Court last week said it would hear a case brought against a mutual fund for charging investors too much, and some observers say the decision could set a new standard that will result in lower management fees.
At issue is how courts decide if a mutual-fund manager is charging too much for its services.
Since 1970, when Congress changed the law to allow so-called excessive fee lawsuits, investors have never won a case, though there have been some substantial out-of-court settlements.
…
What made the case stand out from other excessive fees cases was a spat it triggered between two of the nation’s most respected judges.
In May, Judge Frank Easterbrook ruled for Harris, saying in effect that fees can’t be considered excessive unless fraud was involved. The market, he argued, will ensure that fees aren’t too high because investors essentially will vote with their wallets and dump funds they consider unreasonably priced.
But Easterbrook’s colleague on the Seventh Circuit, Judge Richard Posner, wrote a scathing dissent of Easterbrook’s ruling. Posner argued that leaving fees purely to the market was flawed and called for a rehearing of the case, though his attempt failed.
…
Posner highlighted a factor that could be considered when judging whether a mutual fund fee is excessive: comparing it to what the fund manager charges institutional clients.
Posner pointed out that Harris charged Oakmark fund investors 1% on the first $2 billion of a fund’s assets. But institutional and other clients were charged roughly 0.5% for the first $500 million and roughly one-third of a percent for everything above. He said this pricing difference was of “particular concern.” Here you have two judges with opposing views. While I am in favor of lower fees, I believe that each mutual fund company should be able to set their own rates just like any business can charge for goods and services whatever the market allows. Sliding fee schedules are standard procedure in the financial services industry and having a different set of numbers apply to (large volume) institutional investors compared to (small volume) retail investors seem reasonable as long as they are disclosed to everyone. We are living in different times now. Only less than 10 years ago, as a mutual fund investor, you did not have the variety of low cost choices as we have now with the proliferation of some 700 ETFs. To me, the answer is simple. If you don’t like a fund for whatever reason (performance or fee structure), you can vote with your feet and go someplace else. Having the courts decide what a fund company can charge under what circumstances means we’re walking down a very slippery slope with government interference when none is warranted.
[Emphasis added]
Sunday Musings: Wild Forecasts
Reader Mike pointed to “Dent, Napier and Prechter—Wise to Heed Their Predictions.” If you have not heard any wild predictions lately, you’re in luck. Take a look at some of the highlights:
Harry S. Dent Jr., the author of ‘The Roaring 2000s’, ‘The Roaring 2000’s Investor’, ‘The Next Great Bubble Boom’ and his latest book entitled ‘The Great Depression Ahead’ states that
“The most important cycle change for your wealth, health, life, family, business, and investments is just ahead during the first and last depression you are likely to experience in your lifetime.”
Dent makes it clear that his predictions, while almost always contrary to most economists and expectations, have almost always proved to be correct because his predictions are based on the same sound and quantifiable logic insurance actuaries use with a high degree of accuracy to predict, decades in advance, when people will die.
With that understanding of the basis for his forecasting he goes on to predict (and I paraphrase) that:
Dow will Rebound to 10,000 – 13,200 within 6 Months
A likely massive stimulus plan will bolster the economy somewhat into 2009 for a likely rebound in the Dow to between 10,000 and 13,200. A projected bullish scenario puts the Dow between 12,000 and 13,200 between April and September 2009 if the Treasury rescue plan takes hold with the markets anticipating a recovery. A projected bearish scenario assumes that if the recovery is at best rocky, or at worst that we were to move more into a depression in 2009 than a serious recession, that the Dow would only get back to 10,000 to 11,000 and not last as long.
Oil will Increase to $180 – $215+ by 2010 and then Decline to $40 – $60 by 2015
Oil prices will likely rise to a commodity bubble peak of between $180 and $215, possibly even more, and if not that high then, at an absolute minimum, retest its 2008 high of $147, between late 2009 and mid-2010 unless the economy implodes earlier in 2009. We should then see a major crash in oil prices, beginning in 2010, back into the $40 – $60 range, and possibly even lower, between 2012 and 2015 which will continue for years.
Commodities will Peak between 2009 and mid-2010
Commodities in general, including gold and other precious metals despite their crisis hedge qualities in the past, will likely peak between mid- to late 2009 and mid-2010. It will probably be 2020 or 2023 before we see the next sustained commodity boom and bubble which should last into 2039 – 2040.
Dow will Fall to 3,800 – 4,500 by 2012
The next accelerated stock crash, led by emerging markets, Asian stocks, financial stocks and tech stocks – and finally by oil and commodity stocks – will likely occur between mid- to late 2009 and late 2010, when most of the damage will occur, and continue off and on into mid- to late 2012. The Dow will fall at least to 4,500 and more likely as low as 3,800 by mid-2012, the 1994 low where the stock market bubble first began.
Nasdaq will Fall Below 1,100, its 2002 low, by late 2010 or mid-2012 at the latest.
Market will Rally from 2012 until 2017
A substantial bear market rally will likely occur between around mid-2012 and early to mid-2017 and then a less severe downturn will occur from around mid-2017 into early 2020 or as late as early 2023.
Economy will be in a Depression by 2011
The worst of this next depression is likely to hit between mid-2010 and mid-2013, especially around early 2011, but if the banking system continues to implode a deep downturn or depression could begin sometime in 2009 instead of 2010.
This is just a small sample of the predictions featured in this article. As always, while these may be well researched conclusions, I sure would not bank on any of these events happening within the time frame specified.
If in fact a substantial rally materializes first before the bottom drops out and the Dow falls into the 4,000 range by 2012, it will present a repeat disaster for all of those continuing to buy and hold as they’re hanging on for dear life hoping that a bear market rally is the real thing.
My take is that if any of these predictions are somewhat close, they will present tremendous opportunities for those who are willing to unemotionally follow trends and, at the same time, are disciplined enough to get out when trends end. It bears repeating: Investment discipline is the tool that will guide you through these treacherous conditions.

