A Historic Buying Opportunity?

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

Seeking Alpha featured “Have We Reached a Historic Buying Opportunity?” Here are the last two paragraphs:

The main thing I can say about the current environment, Matt, is though I can’t tell you what is running when or if we’re stuck in a 1-year rut or a 5-year rut, what I do know is that the general area we’re in is a historical buying opportunity: a once-in-your-lifetime chance to get your asset allocation plans squared away and really make sure you’re saving what you need to be.

Because we may go down more… we may not even have hit a bottom (though I, like Matt, do think we have), but anyone coming in anywhere down here is not going to be hurting at the current cost basis, if you’ve got a 10- or 20-year horizon, and I don’t care if you’ve got a value tilt, a growth tilt or are 50/50 on your U.S./international weighting.

It’s simply amazing to me that this author continues to harp on a once-in-your-lifetime buying opportunity by getting asset allocations set up and using a 10 to 20 year horizon.

Has nothing been learned from last year’s disaster? I wish the author would take the time and talk to some investors who saw their portfolios cut in half during 2008. These investors will have to spend the next 8 to 10 years just trying to make up losses. To ask them to return to mindless buy and hold investing while we’re still in the midst of a bear market simply borders on ignorance.

While you can get away with buy-and-hold for a while during bull markets, the problem always remains that there is no exit strategy involved to save your bacon if the markets tank. We’re on the dark side of the biggest credit bubble in history and to think that all is smooth sailing from here is simply not being in tune with reality.

I feel part of my job is to point out useless articles like the one above so that investors don’t make the same mistake again of trying to get front row seating on the Titanic.

It’s All Good, Right?

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

The WSJ summed up last week’s market optimism in “It’s All Good, Right? Right?”

The indefatigable optimism of Wall Street is something to behold at times. The market has just been treated to the largest one month of layoffs since the dreary 1970s, which was on the heels of a slew of other global indicators that underscore the depth of the worldwide economic decline. And yet, markets have handled the news reasonably well over the past few days, putting together its strongest week so far this year.

Headed into Friday’s action, the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index had gained 2.42% on the week, and is adding on further gains Friday despite the horrific employment news. The market has also shrugged off a release from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, which noted that its composite leading indicators are at their worst levels since the 1970s, with most economies deemed to be suffering a “strong slowdown.”

“You gotta love the Street: two hundred S&P; CEO’s come out the last two weeks saying things are worse than expected, worse than they’ve ever seen, can’t say how bad it will get, and all we talk about is stabilization because pending home sales ticked up and ISM wasn’t in the thirties,” says Kevin Flynn, president of Avalon Asset Management in Lexington, Mass.

The bits of good news in the past two weeks have been minimal. They can be classified as opinion (the Institute for Supply Management’s surveys, along with Germany’s IFO survey of business sentiment, both of which showed improvement from extremely depressed levels) or hope (expectations for a stimulus package and further progress on the bad bank plan). That has lifted the spirits of investors, for as David Kotok, chief investment officer at Cumberland Advisors in Vineland, N.J., says, “markets like clarity and certainty even when the policy is not the best.”

However, unlike in mid-November, sentiment indicators do not reflect the same level of worry that persisted during that volatile period. Certain sentiment indicators, such as Investor Intelligence’s bull-to-bear ratio, shows about an equal number of each, compared with late 2008, when bears were dominant. The equity put-to-call ratio still reflects a bearish position, but a less extreme one than at the end of last year, and volatility indexes have shown substantial declines — the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index was lately at 42.32, not far from the lows of the year.

“I think we’re going to carry on getting a relentless slew of extremely poor data, but as you know in these bear markets, people latch on these things and get a bear market rally going, and then the weight of bad news crushes it again,” says Albert Edwards, global strategist at Societe Generale in London.

[Emphasis added]

That’s my belief as well as I pointed out in Friday’s commentary. If you get sucked into this rally, get your ego out of the way and be big enough to admit that you could be wrong by using a sell stop on your positions to minimize losses should the trend head back south again.

Once realization sinks in that this stimulus package will have little effect on pulling the economy out of its doldrums, the drop in the market will be fast and furious. Remember the first $350 allocation of TARP money? Down the drain with nothing measurable to show for.

Sunday Musings: Taking A Stance

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

As I was reading a MarketWatch article, I came across a comment section, where someone posted a fascinating story regarding one of the greatest responses to the request for bailout money in the automobile industry.

As a supplier for the former Big 3, this man received a letter from the President of GM North America requesting support for the bailout program.

While I have not been able to verify the accurateness, the response allegedly written by Gregory Knox, President of Knox Machinery Company, has to go down in history as one of the most straight forward and honest replies of a man taking a stance.

It’s a bit lengthy but worth the read:

Gentlemen:

In response to your request to contact legislators and ask for a bailout for the Big Three automakers please consider the following, and please pass my thoughts on to Troy Clark, President of General Motors North America …

Politicians and Management of the Big 3 are both infected with the same entitlement mentality that has spread like cancerous germs in UAW halls for the last countless decades, and whose plague is now sweeping this nation, awaiting our new “messiah”, Pres-elect Obama, to wave his magic wand and make all our problems go away, while at the same time allowing our once great nation to keep “living the dream”. Believe me folks, The dream is over!

This dream where we can ignore the consumer for years while management myopically focuses on its personal rewards packages at the same time t hat our factories have been filled with the worlds most
overpaid, arrogant, ignorant and laziest entitlement minded “laborers” without paying the price for these atrocities, this dream where you still think the masses will line up to buy our products for ever and ever.

Don’t even think about telling me I’m wrong. Don’t accuse me of not knowing of what I speak. I have called on Ford, GM, Chrysler, TRW, Delphi, Kelsey Hayes, American Axle and countless other automotive OEM’s throughout the Midwest during the past 30 years and what I’ve seen over those years in these union shops can only be described as disgusting.

Troy Clarke, President of General Motors North America, states: “There is widespread sentiment throughout this country, and our government, and especially via the news media, that the current crisis is completely the result of bad management which it certainly is not.”

You’re right Mr. Clarke, it’s not JUST management, how about the electricians who walk around the plants like lords in feudal times, making people wait on them for countless hours while they drag a** so they can come in on the weekend and make double and triple time for a job they easily could have done within their normal 40 hour work week.

How about the line workers who threaten newbies with all kinds of scare tactics for putting out too many parts on a shift and for being too productive (We certainly must not expose those lazy bums who have been getting overpaid for decades for their horrific underproduction, must we?!?).

Do you folks really not know about this stuff?!? How about this great sentiment abridged from Mr. Clarke’s sad plea: “over the last few years we have closed the quality and efficiency gaps with our competitors.” What the hell has Detroit been doing for the last 40 years?!? Did we really JUST wake up to the gaps in quality and efficiency between us and them? The K car vs. the Accord? The Pinto vs. the Civic?!? Do I need to go on? What a joke!

We are living through the inevitable outcome of the actions of the United States auto industry for decades. It’s time to pay for your sins, Detroit.

I attended an economic summit last week where brilliant economist, Alan Beaulieu, from the Institute of Trend Research , surprised the crowd when he said he would not have given the banks a penny of “bailout money”. “Yes, he said, this would cause short term problems,” but despite what people like politicians and corporate magnates would have us believe, the sun would in fact rise the next day and the following very important thing would happen, where there had been greedy and sloppy banks, new efficient ones would pop up; that; is how a free market system works, & it does work if we would only let it work”.

But for some nondescript reason we are now deciding that the rest of the world is right and that capitalism doesn’t work – that we need the government to step in and “save us”. Save us my a**, Hell – we’re nationalizing and unfortunately too many of our once fine nation’s citizens don’t even have a clue that this is what is really happening. But, they sure can tell you the stats on their favorite sports teams, yeah – THAT’S really important, isn’t it?

Does it ever occur to ANYONE that the “competition” has been producing vehicles, EXTREMELY PROFITABLY, for decades in this country?… How can that be??? Let’s see: Fuel efficient! Listening to customers! Investing in the proper tooling and automation for the long haul!

Not being too complacent or arrogant to listen to Dr. W. Edwards Deming four decades ago when he taught that by adopting appropriate principles of management, organizations could increase quality and simultaneously reduce costs. Ever increased productivity through quality and intelligent planning! Treating vendors like strategic partners, rather than like “the enemy”! Efficient front and back offices! Non union environment!

Again, I could go on and on, but I really wouldn’t be telling anyone anything they really don’t already know down deep in their hearts. I have six children, so I am not unfamiliar with the concept of wanting someone to bail you out of a mess that you have gotten yourself i nto – my children do this on a weekly, if not daily basis, as I did when I was their age. I do for them what my parents did for me (one of their greatest gifts, by the way) – I make them stand on their own two feet and accept the consequences of their actions and work through it. Radical concept, huh? Am I there for them in the wings? Of course – but only until such time as they need to be fully on their own as adults.

I don’t want to oversimplify a complex situation, but there certainly are unmistakable parallels here between the proper role of parenting and government. Detroit and the United States need to pay for their sins. Bad news people – it’s coming whether we like it or not. The newly elected Messiah really doesn’t have a magic wand big enough to “make it all go away.” I laughed as I heard Obama “reeling it back in” almost immediately after the final vote count was tallied, “we really might not do it in a year or in four”. Where the Hell was that kind of talk when he was RUNNING for office.

Stop trying to put off the inevitable folks. That house in Florida really isn’t worth $750,000. People who jump across a border really don’t deserve free health care benefits. That job driving that forklift for the Big 3 really isn’t worth $85,000 a year. We really shouldn’t allow Wal-Mart to stock their shelves with products acquired from a country that unfairly manipulates their currency and has the most atrocious human rights infractions on the face of the globe. That couple whose combined income is less than $50,000 really shouldn’t be living in that $485,000 home.

Let the market correct itself folks – it will. Yes it will be painful, but it’s gonna’ be painful either way, and the bright side of my proposal is that on the other side of it all, is a nation that appreciates what it has and doesn’t live beyond its means and gets back to basics and redevelops the patriotic work ethic that made it the greatest nation in the history of the world, and probably turns back to God.

Sorry – don’t cut my head off, I’m just the messenger sharing with you the “bad news”. I hope you take it to heart.

Poor Investment advice

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

MarketWatch had some interesting thoughts in “The high price of poor investment advice.” Let’s listen in:

Investment advisers, some of whom are inexperienced yet sincere representatives of the largest financial services firms, repeat stories they have memorized about where the best investments may be and how to find them.

Whatever happened to some of these great storied opportunities and pearls of investment wisdom? How are they holding up in today’s market?

Let’s take a look:

1. “China and Asia are the best long-term investments and will drive the future of investing.”

While it is hard to read the tea leaves in volatile markets, it does appear that China is recovering and building for the next business growth cycle. Meanwhile, raw-materials suppliers, especially Brazil, are helping China achieve its potential.

Maybe they will recover and lead; but that does not make them a good investment at this time while the world is stuck in the middle of a bear market. Company layoffs and sharply declining exports are just beginning and any engagement in bottom fishing hoping for a quick recovery can have negative consequences for your portfolio.

2. “Economic growth in Asia is independent of the U.S. market.”

True over the long-term, but Asian stocks now move in synch with U.S. stocks. The customer must grow to be able to buy in quantity from the producer.

Asia has 10 times the population of the U.S. and three times the economic growth rate of the U.S. While Asia may be a great long-term investment now at “fire-sale” prices, it could be years before the region heats up again.

The myth of Asia and other parts of the world being decoupled from the U.S. came down crashing hard and fast. I agree that any recovery will take years because most of the Asian economies were built on export and selling product to the ever hungry American consumer. This consumer has gone into hibernation for years to come.

3. “I get my advice from (fill in your favorite major bank or stockbroker) and they will take care of me.”

It’s wishful thinking to get advice from inexperienced sales representatives of firms that went bankrupt for creating troubled assets (which are no longer worth even a fraction of their original value) and “eating their own poison” by foolishly keeping them in their portfolios.

The average no-load stock fund manager has just over four years of on-the-job experience (that doesn’t even stretch back to the 2000-2002 bear market). Even the five-star rated funds averaged a loss of 29.1% in 2008; at least those managers average six-and-a-half years of experience.

A stockbroker taking care of you? Oh yes, that turned out to be the biggest lie of 2008. As I have written many times before, brokers and others engaged in selling products based on commission are in the business of generating income for the firm and are not concerned too much about your financial well being.

They only know how to get you into an investment and continue to prove that buy-and-hold is the ultimate losing proposition. Here’s the best advice I could ever give you: Never ever do business with an advisor/broker that does not have an exit strategy. That will eliminate over 95% of them.

4. “International funds add to your diversification.”

If your advisers don’t want to work enough to change your domestic asset allocation, why expect them to understand international investing?

In the past five years some countries’ stock market indexes grew at five times the rate of the U.S. stock market (until U.S. stocks fell off the cliff), and while the U.S. dollar was declining, international investing was safer.

Sure, in a bull market, it’s a great idea to diversify into some international funds. However, in a bear market, they go down faster than then domestic market. This was proven via our international Trend Tracking Index (TTI), which signaled a sell on 11/13/07; way before the domestic TTI did on 6/23/08.


5. “What is your risk tolerance? Let’s talk about an asset allocation especially for you.”

There is little academic research on risk tolerance. Risk tolerance is a sales pitch based on your ignorance of investment risks. It is all about having you tell the adviser about what you are afraid of and what you can be convinced will address your concerns — not the odds of investment success.

In recent years, avoiding risk has been more successful than taking it. Your advisers had no idea because they wanted to sell you something (gather your assets under management) instead of growing your assets. As a result, over the past decade you often invested in growth funds that didn’t grow and value funds that added no value.

If you follow mindless asset allocation, you bet it’s important to work with an investor’s risk tolerance. If you follow trends, and you use sell stops at all times, that issue becomes less important.

6. “I only invest in five-star Morningstar stock funds.”

The 274 five-star Morningstar rated, no-load stock funds lost 29.1% on average last year. Why? They wouldn’t go to cash to protect you from investment losses and many took excessive risk to earn star ratings.

Using Morningstar rankings along with buy-and-hold is the biggest losing strategy an investor can engage in when we are crossing into bear territory. The sad story is that neither Morningstar nor the investing public learned that fact from the 2001 bear market, which is why they participated in a repeat losing performance in 2008.

7. “The stock market will come back.”

Frankly, if your stock funds’ value doesn’t disappear, it doesn’t have to come back. Since the end of 1999, most fund companies have lost you so much money that you may never see your investments intact in your lifetime.

Sure, the market will come back. The question is will you be around to experience it? Losing 40% to 50% of a portfolio’s value, as happened to many in 2008, will alter your future forever. Hopefully, you won’t be one of those who can finally retire about 6 years after you have died.

8. “Long-term goals can only be reached by investing in the stock market. The money market won’t get you there.”

To build up wealth over the long-term you need to have the discipline of avoiding losses in down markets and investing in the hottest sectors in rising markets.

True. Being in money market will not make you rich. However, it’s an appropriate investment vehicle to be in when the markets are in turmoil. It sure makes more sense to be safely on the sidelines than watching your portfolio slide into abyss. The famous gambling line “Know when to hold ‘em—know when to fold ‘em” makes a lot of sense in this environment.

No Load Fund/ETF Tracker updated through 2/5/2009

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

My latest No Load Fund/ETF Tracker has been posted at:

http://www.successful-investment.com/newsletter-archive.php

Finally, after 4 losing weeks, the major indexes rallied on hopes of a new stimulus package being finalized.

Our Trend Tracking Index (TTI) for domestic funds/ETFs remains below its trend line (red) by -8.82% thereby confirming the current bear market trend.



The international index now remains -15.89% below its own trend line, keeping us on the sidelines.

For more details, and the latest market commentary, as well as the updated No load Fund/ETF StatSheet, please see the above link.

Preserving Capital

Ulli Uncategorized Contact

Reader Ray submitted an article by Barrons’ titled “Capital Idea: Preserve It:”

THIS YEAR MARKS SEVENTIETH ANNIVERSARY of the apotheosis of the Golden Age of Hollywood with the release of both Gone With the Wind and The Wizard of Oz in 1939. But the period isn’t recalled as a golden era for the stock market.

The 1938-42 span might be a likely scenario for the stock market with volatile, zig-zag drops and rallies but no net progress, as Louise Yamada explained here yesterday.

Unsatisfying and frustrating as that might be, it still would be a lot better than the plausible alternative — further declines in the major averages through the lows of the last bear market of 2002-03, according to the long-time market watcher and head of Louise Yamada Technical Research Advisors.

What’s not likely to happen is the more certain prediction for 2009: a revisit to the old highs any time soon. A year ago, she warned her clients that a major decline was underway. After many stocks and commodities had parabolic rises, with the help of leverage of 30 times and more, the withdrawal of that leverage has made for the dramatic declines.

Even within bear markets, impressive rallies of 20% or more are prevalent prior to stocks reaching their ultimate lows, which was the case from 2000 to 2003, Yamada observes. But they’re only suitable for nimble traders to play.

Indeed, the hopes that buying opportunities can be perilous to investors. It wasn’t the Great Crash that wiped out stockholders in 1929; it was the subsequent wrenching declines into the ultimate 1932 lows that did in the bottom-pickers, she points out in an interview.

Despite the bounce off of the market’s Nov. 20 low that took the Standard & Poor’s 500 up 24% to its recent high of Jan. 6, Yamada says there has been too much technical damage from the massive declines from the 2007 highs (47%-55% depending on the index) to consider this anything but a bear-market rally. “There is a long repair process ahead through 2009, assuming we have even seen the ultimate lows,” she writes in a report to clients.

Indeed, she says the S&P; Nov. 20 close took out the old lows. Similarly, 13 stocks in the Dow 30 also have broken their 1002-03, as has the overall Dow when adjusted for inflation.

Moreover, even “outperforming” groups merely have gone down less than the major averages. Health-care stocks, typically a defensive group, have broken down and have formed a massive top, she adds.

Beyond the need for recuperation, there are no groups that are prepared to lead a new bull market. Those typically are industry groups that have years building bases from which to launch a new advance.

While traders might be able to play volatile swings, the parabolic rise in the bull market can result to an equivalent overshoot to the downside, she warns. That tendency leads her to prefer to protect capital in this treacherous market environment.

There are two kinds of losses, Yamada explains: A loss of capital and a loss of opportunity; but there will always be another opportunity if you protect capital.

This has been my view all along. Bottom pickers are at it again in full force. The problem is that most will assume that the final bottom is in and won’t see the need to protect their investments via sell stops, in case they’re wrong and the markets head lower. Even those buy-and-holders, who have not learned a lesson and are still hanging on, will be in for a rude awakening, should the bottom drop out.

It’s impossible to predict whether lower lows are ahead or not. However, the trends are clearly entrenched in bear market territory, so that possibility exists and you should plan accordingly. It’s wise to heed Louise Yamada’s words “There are two kinds of losses: A loss of capital and a loss of opportunity; but there will always be another opportunity if you protect capital.”