Snookered? By a Société Générale rogue trader? I don’t think so. If the Fed really was “snookered,” it was “snookered” by any number of the following that are absolutely not related to a Société Générale rogue trader:

More than $100 billion in writedowns (so far) related directly to subprime mortgages, including $22.4 billion from Merrill Lynch (MER), $19.9 billion from Citigroup (C), $14.4 billion from UBS (UBS) and $9.4 billion from Morgan Stanley (MS).

From the July peak, a stunning $340 billion, or 15.6%, collapse in total commercial paper, a decline of unprecedented magnitude.

A $1.2 billion third quarter loss by Countrywide Financial (CFC), the nation’s largest mortgage lender, the first loss for the company in 25 years.

A 1.4% drop nationally in the median price of a home, the first national drop since the Great Depression.

A 70% year-over-year increase in homes in some stage of foreclosure, per the latest data available from the Mortgage Bankers Association.

A 25% decline nationally in housing starts, the steepest decline since 1980.

Tighter credit standards for businesses and consumers despite a reduction in interest rates.

Christopher Gabrieli, who runs the city’s finances, wants his money back.

Gabrieli and his friends are one in a parade of boobs who appear to have wanted big returns but were not willing to apply proper due diligence to what they were buying. The man may be unhappy, but the result should be that he is pushed out of his job. He says Merrill did not send him details on the investment until it was too late. The real question is why he did not ask for them before he wrote Merrill a check.

Over the next few months, countless municipalities and institutions will complain that firms like Merrril robbed them. In reality, the buyers failed to read the fine print.

So what do we know so far about the stimulation-nation® package?:

· $150 billion price tag (still not saying where this money is coming from)

· $600 for most single tax-payers

· $1,200 for two-wage households

· $300 per child

· 116 million taxpayers will receive checks of some size

· $75,000 single taxpayer ceiling and $150,000 couple ceiling

· Pro-rated or receiving no tax rebate above the ceiling limit

· These rebates compose about two-thirds of the package

· One-third is tax breaks for businesses (somewhat sketchy at the moment but we can all guess how this is going to look)

· Short-term increase of $625,500 from $417,000 for GSE mortgage purchases

· Lower down payment for FHA loans

· Increase loan caps for FHA-insured mortgages

They actually state in the stimulation-nation® package that their desire is to increase loans to “riskier” borrowers who have not been able to get mortgages since the credit collapse in 2007. That is, let us rinse and repeat the same thing that got us into the current mess. I’ll address the final points regarding the caps being raised at the end of the article since I haven’t heard such anger since the announcement of the FHASecure program proposed in August or the Hope Now Alliance dished out in December. How well are those doing in stopping the oncoming recession? It is full of hot air and political posturing just like Hilary Clinton’s 5-year absurd mortgage freeze. The price tag if these things were to be fully implemented would bankrupt the country but it isn’t stopping these financial desperados from deficit spending. Whatever happened to balancing the budget?

The first assumption is that people are going to fight to keep their homes but we already know many people are simply walking away. The second thing to consider is why do you think that for profit industries will buy toxic mortgage products? These greedy corrupt plutocrats are edging closer and closer to a full out bailout of Wall Street and the real estate industry but they aren’t stupid either. As it stands, the raise in caps will only sound good until people have to show real world incomes for fiction priced homes. This will not create jobs and is equivalent to lenders in our agricultural history loaning money to farmers and calling in loans right before the crop harvested forcing a foreclosure. Only this time, instead of the farm we have McMansions and lenders are trying to figure multiple ways to stick it to the lower and middle class hamster consumers. They want the mass population to make up for their greed and financial mal-investment. Here are a couple of simple solutions that will start working without raising taxes:

1. Allow for mortgage cram-downs and the ability for judges to rewrite loans to affordable measures based on the current owner’s household income. If the goal is keeping people in their homes, this is a win-win. Lenders had a fiduciary responsibility to make sure and verify that buyers could afford their current monthly payment. If their debt-to-income ratio is up in the 50+ range like many in California and the owner is teetering on foreclosure, then too bad for the lenders since they are going to have to eat their own irresponsibility. The owner stays in their home and the lender doesn’t have a complete loss.

2. Aggressively go after companies that did predatory lending, confiscate their assets and those of their Ponzi organizers and create a “trust-fund” to assist those nearing foreclosure. These people made incomes on the back of pushing deliberately dangerous paper that is now imploding. And guess what? Many of the heads of these places are getting off with severance packages in the millions. How politicians are working with these corrupt white-collar criminals is beyond me.

Of course my preferred method is let these lenders implode and let the market take care of itself. This populist rhetoric of saving homes is sickening since on the back of this language they try to raise caps to $625,500. How do those in middle America feel about this? Our national median home price is roughly $223,800. Heck, even Southern California’s median home price is now near $400,000 and no county in Southern California is even over $565,000. Guess who called for higher caps last year:

“NEW YORK, Dec 5 (Reuters) – Countrywide Financial Corp’s (CFC.N: Quote, Profile , Research) chief executive called on the U.S. Congress to temporarily raise the maximum size of mortgages that Fannie Mae (FNM.N: Quote, Profile , Research), Freddie Mac (FRE.N: Quote, Profile , Research) and the Federal Housing Administration may buy or insure by 50 percent to $625,000.

In an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal on Wednesday, Chief Executive Angelo Mozilo, whose company is the largest U.S. mortgage lender, said the increase from $417,000 should be implemented for up to a year.

He said this would go a long way toward alleviating a nationwide housing crunch, which analysts expect to pinch borrowers and lenders throughout 2008 and probably beyond.

“It should be enacted as part of a broader package of reforms to ensure that these linchpins of our mortgage system can aggressively support the housing market in a time of need, and that the appropriate controls and oversight are in place to protect taxpayers,” Mozilo wrote.

Mozilo had previously called for the cap to be raised to as much as $850,000.”

Bwahaha! Fantastic! The administration is following the lead of Angelo Mozilo. Seems like they pick winners each and every time. I’ll have to call them up next time I go to Vegas. Amazingly, the cap was raised to $625,500, you know that extra $500 is so the government can then send $600 back to you in this wonderful housing circle jerk. It is also being implemented supposedly for a year just as our good respectable friend has called for. If you need anymore proof that Washington needs to change, this is it. Keep in mind that Mozilo was stating in the forth quarter that Countrywide was going to turn a profit. The President listened to Mozilo’s stimulation-nation® idea and now we are going down the path of unintended consequences.

Let us now go back to the $600 many of you will be getting. If you recall, in 2001 a similar stimulus package was put together to rescue the ailing economy:

“In 2001, taxpayers received $300 each or $600 for a married couple, as the economy tipped into a recession.

“About half the money got spent,” said Lawrence Mishel, president of the liberal Economic Policy Institute, with the rest going to savings or paying debts. He said the rebate helped to soften the recession, but he said there is a better way to spur the economy.

“Give money to people who are on unemployment or receiving food stamps,” Mishel said. “Those are the people we know who are most likely to spend the money.”

Okay, so people are going to spend $300 while we raise caps by $208,500. This is backward logic and pathological avoidance that you now have major motivation to vote these status quo politicians out of their publicly financed offices! This reminds me of Bush talking about how it is every American’s patriotic duty to spend. With the $600 rebate, you can enroll in a local community college basic finance course for about $100, then with $20 you can purchase a good introduction to money management book, and with the other $480 you can put it into a high-yielding money market account (which will be gone since the Fed is punishing savers). You would think this message would be sent to the American public but instead they want you to strap on your blue suede shoes and go to the mall or Target and buy Chinese made trinkets while banks and Wall Street keeps selling out America to foreigners. Just think of Abu Dhabi buying a 4.9 percent in Citigroup. Yes sir, the fundamentals of this economy are so strong that Ben Bernanke did an emergency c-section Fed cut this week and tried to keep a straight face saying, “hey, nothing to look at here! Just dropping rates by .75 basis points!”

While you Where Sleeping – Raising Caps

Not much news has been shed on the cap raise. Most of the 24 hour media circuit has been ballyhooing about the $600 big ones you are going to get while energy keeps soaring, wages stagnate, and housing keeps on tanking. Instead of asking the hard questions they superficial examine the issue and move on. I keep hearing the damn “it was subprime” line over and over as if that was the one issue that drove this economy to where we are at. No, it is the fact that one rogue junior trader in France can cost a company $7.1 billion by unwinding positions in a hedge fund. That $7.1 billion is 4.7 percent of our entire stimulus package that will reach over millions of Americans. And yet we want to raise caps? Many do not understand that you cannot produce a sustainable economy by becoming perpetual paper pushers and house flippers without producing something of real substance. The cap raise was snuck into the proposal, sort of like all companies announcing abysmal earnings this week while the market was tanking as if no one was going to notice.

This bill has been seriously floating around sometime and got traction in September of 2007 when it was pushed by Senator Charles Schumer. The plan was stupid then and nothing has changed that fact. Someone making a 20 percent down payment and going with the current conforming loan limit of $417,000 could finance a home worth $521,250. With prices massively declining in California, you are actually over the median price for a home in the state. What other state is more expensive and has the sheer number of homes that we have? None. Do we really need to raise caps? Of course not.

This is the same political posturing like the 5-year rate freeze. The only way this is going to have any teeth is if the government suddenly starts going no income, no documentation, and starts buying Pay Option ARMS. Keep in mind most FHA loans have been performing well in contrast to other loans. Single-family mortgages purchased by Freddie Mac in 2006 had a mean FICO score of 720 and a mean LTV of 73 percent. Fannie Mae has similar numbers with a mean FICO of 716 and LTV of 73 percent. However overall jumbo loans during this period had a FICO of 697 and a LTV of 77 percent that would qualify for Enterprise purchase. These are only loans that would qualify. You can only painfully imagine how some of the other loan portfolios look. The government will be taking on more credit risk if they raise caps. The door is being left open for bailouts.

Now there is nothing wrong in buying larger mortgages so long at the loan-to-value ratios make sense. Fannie and Freddie have been extremely cautious in buying IO mortgages and negative amortizing ARMs and it would appear that there is no reason that they should start doing so in the current climate. They are a business and operate for a profit so unless the government forces their hand to buy subprime loans or Pay Option ARMs currently on the market, I don’t see them doing so. However, that is why this is such a pathetic attempt for a bailout with marginal benefits for the economy that I say we scrap it all together and start confronting the brutal facts. Straight talk right?

Also, there is clamoring that now refinances are going to go through the roof. Not exactly. If you haven’t paid attention Southern California is now down by double-digits. The credit crisis only hit in August of 2007 and already we are sinking like a submarine. There are now many homeowners under water on ridiculous mortgage products. For example, someone has a $500,000 mortgage on a home that is valued at $400,000. Just take a look at a Real Home of Genius for an example. Even if they want to refinance, they can’t unless they want to pony up some money. What idiotic lender will give you $500,000 at better terms on an asset that is valued at $400,000? Knowing how the government is currently operating I wouldn’t be surprised.

I did a post way back in November of 2006 when Option ARM loans were still popular briefly stating that the mortgage mentality was based on Pinto economics. Pinto economics? Well the loud argument at the time was everything was dependent on the monthly nut. The overall price didn’t matter. Hence the popularity of Pay Option ARMs and Interest Only products since they targeted the monthly nut and artificially lowered prices. Yet my main argument was that the underlying asset is what matters, not the monthly price. You can buy a Pinto and pay $50 per month over 20 years at 0 percent interest and it is still a horrible deal.